COVID-19

Part 1:

It's Gonna Be OK!

 

Let's be logical.  

To figure out what to do, we have to figure out what's actually going on.  And to do that, we need logic.

When you're in the midst of a crisis, the LAST thing you need is a state of panic, which leads to  emotional decision-making.  We want to approach this situation as rationally as possible.

Contents:

Perspective

Media and Emotions

.

Cooking the Numbers

.

The Proper Response

.

 

Perspective

 

Looking at It Rationally

"Is there a new virus?"

 

Well, there are always new viruses.  That's what viruses do; they invent new versions of themselves.  They're always doing this.  That's why flu and colds keep coming back year after year.

 

A "novel coronavirus" is not a "novel" thing.

The pertinent question is: "How dangerous is it?"

Right?

And... "Is its level of danger enough to justify the level of alarm, and authoritarian responses we've seen - i.e. the total shutdown of human society, and universal condemnation of the human body to the status of property of the bio-medical industrial complex?"

Is the virus dangerous enough to justify such a terrifying response to it?

And even if it were, would such a response actually be worth it?

Is it worth producing the ugliest society that has ever been conceived?

 

...forever?

 

And...

 

Does such cruelty reduce the virulence of the pathogen

in the first place? 

 

Might this type of response make the "crisis"

even worse - rather than better?

 

If you eliminate community, collapse the economy, remove all the social and spiritual activities that sustain people's mental health, keep people out of the sunlight, terrorize them with 9/11-style bioterror porn from morning to night, and crush the human spirit more than it's ever been crushed before...

 

...does that even help with fortifying

our immune systems against a pathogen?

Or might this actually exacerbate the problem?

 

We'll be exploring the answers to these questions as you scroll down.

"Of course the virus is dangerous!  It's contagious.  It kills people!  It's worth doing WHATEVER MUST BE DONE to defeat it!  No price is too high to pay for SAFETY!"

 

Lots of viruses are contagious and kill people.  Flu does that.  Even colds do that, in people who are frail and vulnerable.  That's why standard practice in nursing homes is to isolate residents who have colds.  But not the general public.

 

We have never had a blanket quarantine of all society.

 

"Yes, but this new one kills MORE PEOPLE than colds or influenza!  A LOT MORE!"  

 

How do you know that?

"Because the numbers say so!  The government says that THOUSANDS of people have died so far!"

Thousands of people succumb to the flu every year.

Official estimates range from 20,000 to 80,000 per year in the United States, and 290,000 to 650,000 worldwide.

For the flu.

​"Well in the USA, over _ _ _ , 0 0 0 people have died from Covid19 so far!  And almost _ _ _ , 0 0 0 worldwide!  That's several times more than a flu season!"

Those numbers involve statistical tricks.  The same way a clever tax attorney can manipulate numbers to decrease your taxes, a clever statistician can do the same with statistics - especially if he has the cooperation of the relevant government agencies who can define the standards and protocols for collecting and reporting those numbers.

"Oh please, I don't buy into that!  That sounds like a conspiracy theory!"

We have a very simple and handy explanation of exactly how they're doing it, complete with all relevant citations and sources, which you'll see a bit further down, if you keep reading.

"Bah!  I don't care what YOU say.  I believe the scientists."

 

There are plenty of scientists who sare saying exactly what we're saying.

 

They're saying it's equivalent to the flu.  Some say it's even less than the flu.  Some are even wondering whether the virus exists at all - but we'll get to that a little later.

Does it justify the most intense advancement

of collective child abuse ever devised?

Does it justify collapsing the economy, abolishing all dignity, and banishing the entire concept of individual rights to the trash-heap of history?

Lockdown-Damage

How Government Policies

Are Exacerbating the Crisis

Even if there is an increase in general sickness and morbidity in society in general right now, we don't know how much of it comes from the novelty and virulence of the new virus, vs. how much comes from policy-induced collective immuno-suppression.

 

And there are many such variables:

 

1.  Deferred care

In March and April, hospitals closed themselves off to non-coronavirus healthcare.  People with cancer, heart disease, kidney disease, liver disease, and other problems had to postpone their care. 

Even after the rules eased and these patients were allowed to return, many chose to stay away anyway, due to fear induced by the media.

How many of the "overall excess deaths" came from the postponing of non-covid medical care?

2.  Sudden Induced Poverty

 

If you force an entire country into sudden unemployment, what happens?

How does poverty impact public health?

How does sudden, mass poverty impact public health?

 

If public health is decreased, what results can be expected?

 

How much of the overall increase in deaths in recent months are from the cascading effects of sudden mass-poverty?

What kind of psychological state do people develop when they're forced to sit home and do nothing all day?

How does that state of mind impact health?

 

3.  Social isolation.

 

It has long been known that our health is impacted by our social lives.  Loneliness causes immuno-suppression.

​Some elderly people have not had any human contact since February.

 

If there is an increase in the severity of symptoms of infectious disease, how much of that increase might be due to immuno-suppression from locking people in their homes, cancelling social events, closing public spaces, and making people "socially distance" and avoid visiting their friends and families?


4.  Depression

Loneliness and sudden unemployment both lead to depression, which also suppresses the immune system.

How much did this sudden induced mass-depressive episode impact the population's immune systems?

5.  Suicide.

A recent study found that, in the United States, for every 1% increase in unemployment, there is a corresponding increase in suicides by 69,300.

Unemployment skyrocketed to an unprecedented 30-40% in April.

lockdown suicides.jpg

 

All around the world, doctors are reporting an enormous increase in lockdown-associated suicides.

THE COST OF QUARANTINE: ‘We’ve Seen A Year’s Worth Of Suicide Attempts In The Last Four Weeks,’ California Doc Says

Trauma doctors at a northern California medical center say the hospital has seen a huge spike in suicide attempts amid the coronavirus COVID-19 lockdowns.

Dr. Mike deBoisblanc, head of the trauma at John Muir Medical Center in Walnut Creek near San Francisco, said the loss of more than 37 million jobs across the country amid state shutdowns of businesses deemed “nonessential” and lengthy lockdowns have affected mental health.

Have any of your news reports mentioned this issue?

One reporter did, when she asked New York governor Andrew Cuomo.  Instead of denying it, his answer was essentially "Yea, so what?"

And to top off the insanity, those suicides might be counted as "Covid fatalities" in the statistics, and contributing to the "100,000+" tally!

6.  Forbidden sunlight.

 

Sunshine is essential for immune health.

Yet they're ordering us to get as little of it as possible.

People were threatened with fines (and arrest!) for going outside.

"Whatever you do, do NOT get sunlight, unless you absolutely HAVE to.  Sincerely, your Governor."

Yea yea, exercising is permitted.  But you better be careful it's not non-essential exercise.

If you mess up... you can go to jail for a year.

Best to just stay inside, and not press your luck.

You might not have taken these orders that seriously.  But a lot of people did.  Especially the elderly.  Many of them stayed away from the Sun, because their government told them to. 

What happens to public health when you keep a population indoors, during the beautiful days of spring, away from sunlight, and glued to their TV's?

7.  Forbidden Exercise

Gyms have been forcefully closed. 

Athletic tracks were forcefully closed. 

People were arrested for surfing.

Why ban surfing?  Why ban kayaking?  What do these solitary forms of recreation have to do with stopping transmission of a virus?

​Jogging was banned.

They forbade hiking.

Why do this?  Why close hiking trails?

 

Do trees transmit viruses?

 

Isn't hiking in the wilderness the #1 most social-distancy thing a person can do?

It's also jut about the healthiest thing you can do.  Fresh air, being in nature, being around trees - it's all essential.  Especially now, when health is so important.  Tons of scientific studies confirm this.

https://www.takingcharge.csh.umn.edu/how-does-nature-impact-our-wellbeing

and https://e360.yale.edu/features/ecopsychology-how-immersion-in-nature-benefits-your-health

and https://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/90720.html

As if we needed science to confirm something so obvious.

 

And yet, they don't want us doing it.  They're threatening us with arrest if we do.

Why?

What do you think happens to public health when entire populations are forbidden from exercising or being in Nature?

8.  Forced muzzling.

 

There is a reason we haven't worn face-masks as our default apparel for the past 200,000 years.

 

A.  They decrease oxygen intake (even leading some people to faint).

 

B.  They increase CO2 inhalation, lowering the pH (acidifying) the bloodstream.

 

C.  They create warm, moist reservoirs of microbes, right in front of the mouth.

 

D.  They force the re-inhalation of exhaled virions, increasing viral load.

And no, there is no reason to wear them:

9.  Nursing home slaughter.

 

Several U.S. governors, (those of California, New York, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey) sent infected patients into nursing homes, in complete contravention to well-established protocols for those facilities. 

 

Even in normal years, colds and flu can kill many people in nursing homes, because of how frail they tend to be.  Even if someone has a common cold, they should not be sent into a nursing home.  In normal years, even common cold patients are isolated from those facilities.

 

Yet these governors sent coronavirus patents in.

 

According to some estimates, this move could have let to over half of the total estimated "death toll."

 

And they were all in the 5 states that had the "worst outbreaks."

-Sending sick patients to nursing homes (the flu, and even the common cold, can kill people in nursing homes).

-Killing patients with ventilators (and governments paying doctors to do it)

https://www.globalresearch.ca/are-ventilators-killing-more-people-than-saving/5709562

 

Seeing the big picture yet?

10.  Ventilator slaughter.

 

Let's use our heads.  If you:

 

A.  Shove a tube down someone's throat

B.  Immobilize them for weeks at a time

C.  Pump them with narcotics for weeks at a time

What happens?

D.  Muscles atrophy

E.  Circulation plummets

F.  Organs shut down

G.  Vital functions erode

H.  The body breaks down

Just from the intubation. 

A person wouldn't need to even have a "virus" in order for such a treatment to kill them. 

Ventilators have been likened to manslaughter.

How many "Covid fatalities" are really intubation fatalities?
 

11.  Extreme Anxiety

Don't go outside.  Don't exercise.  Don't go to work.  Don't go see your friends and family.

Just stay stuck inside, on your sofa, alone, watching TV, and shivering in fear.

What do you think happens to public health when you've got people terrified for months?

1.  When you're afraid, your fight-or-flight response takes over.

2.  Stress hormones start circulating.

3.  Stress hormones interfere with immune function.

4.  Blood is diverted to the extremities - the arms, legs, hands, and feet.

 

That's because, in our evolutionary past, anxiety usually meant there was something to run from.  A lion, tiger, a pack of wolves, and so on.

 

So the fight or flight response sends blood to the extremities so that you can use them to run really fast, and climb stuff to get out of the way.

So when you're chronically anxious, all that blood is going to your extremities, instead of to your internal organs. 

5.  Organs, lacking blood flow, cannot function optimally.

Cells have less blood for regeneration.  Many bodily-sustenance functions drop.  Tissue is not repaired.  Enzymes are not produced. 

7.  If you're sick, you stay sick or get sicker.

8.  If you aren't sick, you're more vulnerable to getting sick.

Chronic anxiety is bad for health.

 

If you're suffering from intense anxiety all day long, if you're glued in front of a television that's pumping you up with extra strength industrial fear-porn, then your immune system is going to become compromised.

 

And what is the corporate media doing right now?

Suppressing the entire population's immune systems.

 

MSNBC, CNN, the New York Times, The Washington Post... They are engaged in a massive collective immuno-suppression of the entire population.
 

The purpose of graphics like these is NOT to inform.

It's to elicit an emotion.

FEAR.

With all of these factors going on,

how can you be sure that "excess deaths"

are caused simply by "the virus"?

"Very good points here.  But... I dunno man... I know some people who got the virus.  It's really, REALLY nasty!

And I even know a few people who died!

I'm sure the factors you just described are having a deleterious affect... But are you sure they're ENOUGH to cause so much damage?"

There's still one more major piece of this puzzle:

12.  Collective Conversion Disorder

This is a phenomenon in which anxiety is converted into physical symptoms.  Here's the definition from Wikipedia:

Conversion disorder (CD), or functional neurologic symptom disorder, is a diagnostic category used in some psychiatric classification systems. It is sometimes applied to patients who present with neurological symptoms, such as numbness, blindness, paralysis, or fits, which are not consistent with a well-established organic cause, which cause significant distress, and can be traced back to a psychological trigger. It is thought that these symptoms arise in response to stressful situations affecting a patient's mental health or an ongoing mental health condition such as depression.

"What?? Are you saying that all this sickness is "all in people's heads"?  That's insulting!  These symotoms are definitely real!"

 

And so is conversion disorder.  It's real.  The symptoms from it are real.  This is more than just saying "it's all in your mind."

It starts in the mind, but it produces real, actual symptoms in the body.

And there is a social component to it.  It tends to really "take off" when there is a group involved.  It spreads among a population - just like a virus.

History is littered with examples of psychosomatic illnesses, with no organic cause, spreading among populations, due entirely to mass-psychology.  If one person starts believing themselves to be ill, and they can convince one or two others, then an entire community can start believing in the illness, and falling ill themselves. 

One of the most famous examples happened only a few years ago, in 2016.  Do you remember hearing about the mystery illness at the U.S. Embassy in Havana Cuba? 

At first, they thought it was something in the water.  That was ruled out.

Next, they thought it might be a sonic weapon.  Then an electromagnetic weapon.  Then some super-secret Dr. Evil weapon that the Cubans had developed in secret... you know... with spare parts from their 1953 Chevy's. 

The nerds and scientists were brought in to analyze the situation.  And one by one, all of these causes were ruled out.

Eventually, they realized that it was mass-conversion disorder.  It was psychosomatic.  It started in their heads - and then their heads created it in their bodies. 

This article, from Vanity Fair (not a "conspiracy theory" site) explains it very well:

Here's a link to the article.

Typically, mass-conversion disorder only affects "small, tightly-knit" groups with "high amounts of stress."

However, if you look at the current COVID19 lockdown situation, many of the conditions that define small groups are being fulfilled - even on the scale of the entire globe.

Think about it.  Most people are stuck in their houses, glued to their televisions, shivering in fear, all day long.  They're socially isolated.  They're not seeing their friends.  The television has taken on the role of their social circle.  The only people they're interacting with are the corporate talking-heads at MSNBC, CNN, CBS, BBC, CBC, and so forth.  The pundits have become their social circle.  And the few people they interact with in real life (those in their household) are every bit as terrified, and every bit as credulous, as they are.

The phrase "global village" has been used for quite a long time.  It refers to the level of interdependence of today's world.  And that includes information interdependence.  We have become one global community, and this effect has been magnified 100-fold by the coronavirus situation. 

And as a result, mass-conversion disorder may be able to take shape and spread among the global community, as if it were a "community" - because it is one.

This theory is supported by the fact that all of the "big outbreaks" are occurring in the big urban centers.  Indeed, you'd expect more transmission in a big city, because people are closer together.  But this only explains higher infections - not higher rates of fatality from those infections.  If there's more transmission, more people get infected - but this would not explain the higher rates of severe and life-threatening symptomology.

There are only two things that can explain that.  One is 5G, and the other is the fact that people in big city environments are much more marinated in mass-media than anyone else. 

If you live in the countryside or the suburbs, you get to escape from MSNBC when you turn your TV off.  But if you live in Manhattan, there are literally TVs on buildings.  You can't get away from it.  So if you live in that environment, you're constantly being bombarded by the panic-porn.  Therefore, you're more susceptible to media-induced mass-psychoses - including collective conversion disorder.

Another thing intense anxiety does is interfere with breathing.

 

And what is the main symptom of the bug that most people are talking about?

 

"Aha!  Trouble breathing is one of the main symptoms!  Maybe... Maybe it's coming from anxiety?"

The media is pumping the population full of the very emotion...

 

...which both suppresses the immune system

AND causes breathing problems...

 

...WHILE forcing everyone to wear muzzles that interfere with the breathing process...

 

...in the midst of an alleged pandemic whose most dreaded symptom is difficulty breathing.

Do you see what's going on here?

They're creating an environment in which it's difficult to breathe - both physically (the mask), and mentally (the anxiety) - even if you don't have a virus.

Even if you don't have an infection, you could still easily find yourself experiencing difficulty breathing.

And if that does happen... what happens next? 

You'd immediately wonder if you had "the virus."

Which would skyrocket that fear to a whole new level.

And if you were already having trouble breathing, the extra fear would exacerbate that. 

Which would then convince you you had the virus, for certain.

Which might then make you pass out from fear.

All without even having the virus.

Then, once you're passed out, they'd take you to the hospital - a building utterly saturated with fear - making sure that you're never going to relax and get your natural breathing pattern back, as long as you're there.

 

Next, they'll put you on a ventilator - which, as we already explained, is enough to kill a person all by itself, even without a virus.

 

What was just described is a feedback loop.

 

And it sounds a lot like a phenomenon called  collective conversion disorder.

The symptoms are real - but the cause is mostly internal. ​​​​​​
 

How's this for a theory:

Covid19 is a syndrome, not a virus.

And the syndrome consists of a synergy between a common cold virus and a collective psychological conversion disorder induced by mass media propaganda.  

Most of the symptoms and fatalities that have been reported, most of the tallies, have been statisticially manipulated to inflate the fear.  They're way too high.

Thre is a little bit of extra sickness going around - but not nearly as much as the media make sit out to be with their outlier hyperfocus.

There's still a little bit - but even that little bit comes mostly from the psychological syndrome induced by the media, and not organically from the virus itself.  

What is the virus?  It's a bad, but fairly normal, common cold.  Every year, new colds emerge.  Every year, many of them.  Every year, many new cold viruses emerge.  That's why we keep getting them.

Their virulence varies. Some are worse than others.  Every now and then one goes around that's particularly nasty.  These are the times you hear that lots of people in the office are calling in sick, lots of kids are absent from school - and a higher than normal number of people are getting a higher than normal degree of sick . We've all been through these episodes.  We remember them.  They've happened many times in our lives, already.  But no one made a big deal about them until the media got involved this year, and crafted a coherent psychological syndrome out of one of these bugs.  

Had they done this with any of those other bugs they could have crated the same collective psychosis, complete with conversion induced phsyical symptomology, as they did this year.  The only difference between this one and all the other ones that we've already seen throughout our lives, is that for this one they decided to create a campaign about it in mass consicousnes, through the collusion of sensationalistic meida and government policies that exacerbate the problem for the media to feed on.

They've created a feedback loop between mass media, government policy, and public sickness, wherein each component feeds on the other two.  The lockdowns and other restrictive mandates choke society and create sickness, which then gives the governments further pretext to extend and tighten the restrictions - leading to more sickness - which the media then grabs onto and magnifies, rationalizing the government to tighten the restrictions even further, leading to yet more sickness - and on and on it goes.

"Well this is all very interesting.  It seems you have some very good points here.

 

Obviously the lockdowns do come with costs... and they do hurt people... and they maybe even kill people... but the amount of lives they SAVE (by slowing the transmission of the virus) is GREATER THAN the damage they do.  We know this, because the SCIENTISTS say so!"

These "scientists" suffer from a fundamentally un-balanced way of thinking, and this coronavirus situation has brought it into focus like never before.  They are very skillful at memorizing data and following rulebooks, but they have no idea how to synthesize information and look at the "big picture." 

 

They specialize in one narrow field, and make all of their recommendations based on the conclusions of that one field, without taking any input from any other fields into account.  They don't know (or care) how their policies affect the rest of society's systems.

They are stuck in their left-brain-hemispheres, and disconnected from their right-brain-hemispheres - unable to think non-linearly. 

 

If you're looking at this situation purely from the perspective of an epidemiologist, then the most logical course of action would be to have complete martial-law, with troops in the streets and no one allowed out of their homes for any reason, forever.  As long as germs exist, no human being should have contact with another human being.

Since most epidemiologists have at least some awareness of realty beyond their field, very few would suggest such a regime in its entirety - yet many have come uncomfortably close.

 

And the result is that they have essentially initiated a non-consensual chemotherapy on the entire world.

In chemotherapy, the goal is to kill everything - including the patient - but hope that the cancer cells die just a little bit faster.  If everything goes well, they can abort the treatment while the patient is still only partially killed.

And is that not what the medical bureaucrats have enacted upon the planet in 2020?

Lockdowns destroy society, and the human spirit, and all systems of the body - including the immune system. They create mass-trauma and hysteria, which throws the body and mind out of balance, leaving us less healthy and more vulnerable to disease..

Lockdowns are meant to destroy society and everything in it - while hoping that the virus gets destroyed a little bit faster. 

 

Chemo is bad enough when it's consensual.  But now they're imposing it upon all of us - by force. 

 

And forced medical treatment is a violation of both the Nuremberg Protocols (the standards under which captured Nazi officials were put on trial) and the Geneva Convention.

These people are sick.  And they have to be stopped.

They're like drunks with car keys.  We have to take the keys away from them, before they destroy everything and everyone.

 
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
Subscribe to the Earth Party weekly newsletter!

To donate,

visit our Patreon Page.

 

Questions?  Comments?

Email: EarthPartyInfo@protonmail.com

This site was designed with the
.com
website builder. Create your website today.
Start Now