What's Going On
And the Proper Response
Let's be logical.
To figure out what to do, we have to figure out what's actually going on. And to do that, we need logic.
When you're in the midst of a crisis, the LAST thing you should want to do is get emotional. Panic never leads anywhere good. We want to approach this situation as rationally as possible.
The Proper Response
"Is there a new virus?"
But there are always new viruses.
The pertinent question is how dangerous it is - and whether its level of danger is enough to justify the level of alarm and authoritarian responses that have been imposed (and whether those responses actually mitigate the danger or exacerbate it).
"Of course it's dangerous! It's contagious. It kills people!"
Lots of viruses are contagious and kill people. Flu does that. Even colds do that, in people who are frail and vulnerable. That's why standard practice in nursing homes is to isolate residents who have colds. It's always been that way.
"Yes, but this new one kills more people than colds or influenza!"
How do you know that?
"Are you kidding? The news shows people suffocating and dying in hospitals!"
That happens every year. The difference is, the media rarely filmed it. If they had filmed it, and broadcast it as ubiquitously (and sensationally) as they're doing this year, they could have created a panic in any cold/flu season that they wanted.
This principle is one of the oldest tricks in the media's book, and it's called outlier hyperfocus.
Media and Emotions:
The Power of
It involves picking a few statistical outliers (rare events), and then focusing all of the cameras on them, and thereby making it seem like what's happening to them is happening everywhere, to everyone.
Let's recall some historical examples.
Remember how they spent decades scaremongering us about "drugs"?
All they had to do was find a few people who smoked weed, and also committed crimes...
...just a few people...
- and they could make weed-induced crime look like a pandemic.
They would bring in the cameras and focus all their attention on a small number of people, make tear-jerker films about them, complete with sobbing family members and sad music... and these stories all over the airwaves, in documentaries and public service announcements and commercials.
...ignoring the fact that, when it comes to potentially lethal drugs like heroin, the illegality is what makes them lethal in the first place (since you can't measure an accurate dose if you're getting it from the black market)...
Logic is always the first victim of media sensationalism. But not the last.
These commercials actually caused more people to die, since they caused prohibition to continue, which prevented users from being able to accurately measure their doses. (And this is a mistake that was to be repeated in the coronavirus situation, as we'll be exploring further down this page).
But that doesn't matter to the media. All that matters to them is crafting the narrative.
All it takes is a few. That's all the media needs, in order to make it seem like everyone who uses any illegal herb is going on a crime-spree.
And when it comes to LSD, all they needed was one person. Literally, one person who took LSD and then jumped off a roof because he thought he "could fly", and they made it look like LSD sends everyone jumping off the roof.
And the technique worked. It manufactured consent for the "war on drugs" for 50 years.
Let's fast-forward to 9/11 and terrorism:
All they had to find was one guy sneaking a bomb somewhere in his shoe, and one guy mailing anthrax letters, they can make it seem like there are terrorists lurking around every corner.
And it worked. It manufactured consent for the "war on terror" - a new wave of civil-rights repression and imperial conquest of half the globe, for 20 years, and counting.
This is what the media does. This is its job. This is what it's good at.
"OK, I understand what you're saying. And I agree that "Outlier Hyperfocus" is a dirty trick, and those other hysterias weren't justified.
But THIS ONE IS! There really is a pandemic!
I can FEEL it! Don't you feel the fear everywhere?"
The existence of fear doesn't prove there's really a plague - all it proves, by itself, is that the media wants you to fear.
That feeling you have - that sense of conviction that there "really is a pandemic" - all this proves is that the people managing your feelings - the media - want you to think there's a pandemic. It doesn't prove that there actually is one.
The other hysterias (reefer madness and terrorism) also felt real, while we were in the midst of them.
The question is not "can you recognize a manufactured crisis AFTER it happens"... but "can you recognize it WHILE it's happening?"
"I know this one's real, because... there are... body bags!
Let's approach this with the mind of a scientist.
You have reached the "conclusion" that "more body bags means more fatalities."
But might there be any confounding variables that may have led to this?
Yes. There is at least one.
The protocols for disposal have changed.
Governments have instructed hospitals to treat all bodies as potential biohazards, which requires different methods of disposal.
Normally, the funeral homes simply come in each day to collect bodies of the deceased. They come in, pick them up, load them into the vehicle, and take them to the funeral home.
But now, they can't do that. They now need special refrigerated trucks, special protective gear, and so forth. This is difficult to do, and it's slowing down the process. Thus, they're "piling up."
Did CNN mention this information in their "Oh my gosh, bodybags" report that you watched? Betting they didn't.
"But there are mass graves!"
They're burying people in mass %&$#ing graves!"
Who is this "they"?
It's actually one city - New York - and the phenomenon is 150 years old.
They're talking about Hart Island - a place where the city buries people who had no next-of-kin to claim them. People without families. Or, more importantly, people whose families didn't come to claim their body. Who didn't come in time.
"But the numbers have ramped up! They used to bury 25 a week! Now they're burying 25 a day!"
Are you talking about articles like this one?
First of all, it's 25 a day 5 days a week - so really, it's more like 17 per day.
But again, let's be scientific, and ask: "Might there be a confounding variable?"
Turns out there is. Again. There is a reason for the increase, and it's not an increase in deaths.
Normally, NYC hospitals keep a cadaver for 30-60 days, waiting for it to be claimed, and if it's not claimed in that time, they send it to Hart Island.
And guess what: The City changed that time frame, reducing it down to 6 days.
That'll do it.
If you reduce the time window for people to claim bodies, then obviously you will have many more of them unclaimed, sending them off to the "mass grave" on the island.
Did the article/broadcast you read/watched mention that?
Didn't think so.
"But they increased the time-window from 6 days back up to 14 days. Not the full 30-60 days, admittedly... but still, it's no longer just 6. They brought it up to 14."
But not before they had time to collect the shocking statistics from the period with the 6-day window! They collected those statistics, published them in fear-porn articles FIRST, and THEN raised the time-window back up again (sort of).
See how they do it?
Considering the downright journalistic malpractice of these reports, shouldn't you ask yourself WHY they're doing this?
Why they're so intent on weaving this narrative, even to the point of disregarding basic journalistic ethics?
"But hospitals are overwhelmed!"
Hospital overcrowding happens every year. In 2018, flu season was so bad, hospitals in L.A. were treating patients in tents in the parking lot.
But did you hear about it?
Was it splashed all over the TV, all day, every day?
Here's the article, in case you want to read it.
If hospitals treating patients in tents was not "news" last year, why does it suddenly become news this year?
Because there was no narrative to weave then.
"But it's way worse this year! It's not just a few hospitals - it's practically all of them! They're all overwhelmed this year!"
The city of Houston Texas built a temporary "field hospital" to deal with excess patients - but then dismantled it after it didn't see a single patient.
The hospital ships sent to New York Harbor were dismissed after only a few weeks, after treating only a fraction of the number of patients they were intended for, many of whom did not even have the "coronavirus."
The doomsday projections of hospital capacity made by Governor Gavin Newsom in California were exaggerated by orders of magnitude.
There's even an entire genre of videos on Youtube now, called #FilmYourHospital.
Citizen journalists are venturing into the hospitals in their cities that the news-media says are "overwhelmed", only to find that they're virtually empty, or operating normally. They capture this on camera, so it's hard to argue that it's "fake news."
Here's a handy compilation, to get you started:
Here's some more:
New York City Man does his own checks asks questions ??
Doctors and nurses are even being furloughed due to lack of demand.
If this were really a "pandemic", with hospitals overwhelmed with patients, and not enough doctors to treat them all, why would doctors be furloughed?
"But I saw footage on CNN of hospitals that ARE overwhelmed!"
Again, this exemplifies the media's outlier hyperfocus.
All it takes is one or two overwhelmed hospitals in the entire country, and if billion-dollar-funded networks converge on them, they can make it seem like it's the every hospital in the world.
Citizen journalists are filming the exact hospitals that the news-media tells us are crowded, and showing that they're not.
Crowded hospitals are apparently so hard to find, that some networks, like CBS, are using fake footage from other hospitals, in other countries!
CBS later admitted it:
They say they "made a mistake." But was it, really?
The original clip (from Italy) has a Sky News logo in the upper left corner. (Look at it - you can see it). In order to produce their own plagiarized version, CBS would have needed to remove the logo.
They knew exactly what they were doing.
Why did they need to do something like this? Were they unable to find an actual overwhelmed hospital in New York?
If "just the facts" would have been enough to scare you the way they wanted, why did they resort to fraud?
Can't you tell something is off about all this?
"But it really is more this year! A lot more! The numbers say so!"
Let's talk about the numbers now.
Cooking the Numbers
"The numbers prove there's a pandemic."
And who provides these numbers?
And why is the government trustworthy?
"Why wouldn't it be?"
Considering the fact that its been lying to you about every topic under the Sun, since you were born, why would you trust it now?
"Because independent experts are informing them!"
Experts also said America faced a tidal wave of Islamic terrorists, and invading Afghanistan was the only way to stop it.
Experts said Saddam had WMD's and was planning to use them.
Experts said the Iraq invasion would last a few months to a year. It's now going on 20 years.
Those were the foremost experts in counter-terrorism. And they were wrong.
"Ok but this time, it's based on science!"
Science is not a group of people. It's not a social class or institution. It's a Method.
"Sure. I know. So?"
So how do you know the group of people and institutions that call themselves "science" are actually using the Method of science, when it comes to this topic?
"Because science is part of academia, and I trust academia."
And how do you know academia is beyond the reach of corruption?
Considering that every other major institution in society has been corrupted by the influence of corporate oligarch money, why would academia be an exception? Why would it be the one institution immune?
"I guess you have a point there. But are you saying they're lying about coronavirus statistics? What evidence do you have for that?"
Well, we know the hospitals are counting many non-coronavirus deaths as coronavirus deaths, and counting them in the virus statistics.
If a person dies of any cause - any cause - but also tested positive for coronavirus, then their death is counted in the virus death count.
Cancer? Heart disease?
Falling off a building?
If you had the coronavirus in your system, then the hospital lists coronavirus as the cause of death, and includes you in the statistics.
Even if you were asymptomatic. Even if it had nothing to do with the death.
And this is not merely a "local error" being made by hospitals. This is a mandatory directive coming down from governments.
In the USA, the CDC and various state governments have required all hospitals to report all fatalities as COVID19 fatalities as long as the deceased tested positive for coronavirus in their system.
It's not even on a hospital-by-hospital basis. It's a national and statewide requirement.
The cause-of-death does NOT have to be scientifically determined as COVID19.
No autopsy has to be performed.
No link has to be shown between the viral infection and mechanism of death.
As long as they had the virus when they died, they are required to be included in the statistics.
"This sounds like one of those... conspiracy theories! How do you know this?"
Because the government admits it.
It's not a "theory" if the people doing it admit that they're doing it.
"LOL, the New York Post? That's a rag."
How about Minnesota Public Radio?
"Meh. I don't trust those sources."
How about video?
Here's Dr. Birx on video admitting it:
"Meh! Dr. Birx is a floozy! An airhead! I don't respect her."
OK. How about state health departments?
"From red states like Mississippi? LOL."
How about deep blue states, like... Illinois?
Here's the Illinois Department of Health admitting it:
You see? They're telling you right to your face: COVID19 death statistics include everyone who dies with coronavirus in their system, regardless of what they actually died FROM.
Here is a gallery of over THREE HUNDRED testimonies of individual people who say that their friend or relative was listed as "dying of Covid" when they died of something else entirely.
Oh, and just in case you want to hear another "side" of this (and you should always seek out more than one side!), here is the Factcheck.org article about this issue:
Like many "Factcheck" articles, it starts out by calling the claim a "wild conspiracy theory", but then goes on to confirm the claim, as you read the text, without acknowledging that it's confirming it!
For instance, this article says:
“In the normal course, autopsies would then determine whether the person died of the effects of the COVID virus, whether the person had a brain tumor or brain hemorrhage for example that might be unrelated to it and what the relative significance of both the infection and the pre-existing disease is,” he said. Even if the number of autopsies being conducted are low because of concerns of infection, he said, “then you will include in those numbers some people who did have a pre-existing condition that would have caused death anyway, but that’s probably a small number.”
Likewise, Marc Lipsitch, a professor of epidemiology at Harvard University, told us in an email: “There are going to be some people who die of something else, happen to have COVID and get tested, and get counted as COVID deaths but would die anyway.”
You see, the dumb article confirms, in its text, the claim it denied in its introduction. Typical.
"But how MANY of the official "Covid fatalities" does this trick account for?"
Nobody knows. And that's the whole point. You will never see CNN make this distinction. Nor NBC, CBS, the New York Times, the Washington Post... None of them have made any attempt to hash out this difference. They just give you one lump-sum: 100,000 deaths (or whatever it is at the time), and that's it.
How many of those 100,000 are deaths from non-coronavirus causes?
Isn't it odd that the "news" never talks about this?
Isn't it more than odd?
Isn't it journalistic malpractice?
They don't care.
But guess what? That's just the tip of the iceberg.
It gets even crazier.
Hospitals have been ordered to record a death as coming from COVID19 any time a deceased patient had contact with someone who had the virus - even if the deceased never actually tested positive themselves!
NO TEST + DYING = COVID19 FATALITY.
Let that sink in.
Let's refer back to the same "fact-check" article just cited:
"The CDC advises that officials should report deaths in which the patient tested positive for COVID-19 — or, if a test isn’t available, “if the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty.” It further indicates that if a “definitive diagnosis cannot be made … but it is suspected or likely … it is acceptable to report COVID-19 on a death certificate as ‘probable’ or ‘presumed.'”
One hypothetical example cited by the CDC is an 86-year-old woman dying after exhibiting symptoms such as a high fever, severe cough, and difficulty breathing, “after being exposed to an ill family member who subsequently was diagnosed with COVID-19.” The CDC says that “probable COVID-19” may be listed as the underlying cause of death — a deduction made “given the patient’s symptoms and exposure to an infected individual.”
So yea. Again, confirming the very idea it just called a "conspiracy theory" a few paragraphs earlier.
And here is an official CDC guideline stating exactly this:
Here's the link.
Right there, it's telling you they don't even have to test positive - they don't even have to be tested at all - in order for COVID-19 to be listed as the cause of death, if they die.
Your government is admitting this to you, right to your face!
"Oh but come on! If they were coughing, if they had a temperature, if they couldn't breathe, it's obvious what disease they had!"
Is it really?
The "novel coronavirus" is not the only virus that causes those symptoms.
Can you think of any others?
"Ohhhh no. No you don't. Don't you dare say this is the seasonal flu! I'm warning you!"
Well, what about the fact that...
The flu was especially bad this year,
yet nobody's mentioning it anymore.
The flu still exists. It didn't drop off the face of the Earth.
It didn't stop existing when COVID came along.
The flu didn't say, "alright COVID, you got this, i'ma peace out."
If the flu still exists, where is it? What is it doing? How many of the people getting sick are actually flu victims?
A ton, according to CNN:
Let's look at what we have:
1. The worst *flu* season in decades...
2. Counting every death from flu-like respiratory symptoms as "Covid-19" WITHOUT testing them...
I mean, come on. This is obvious.
A huge portion of the "death toll" from COVID19 is actually the seasonal flu.
Well, have a look at this article from the New York Times:
Yes, you're reading that correctly. In just one data "adjustment", they increased the fatality count for the ENTIRE COUNTRY...
...by 17 percent!!!
And NONE OF THEM TESTED POSITIVE FOR THE VIRUS.
The New York Times just admitted it! Right there!
Are you seeing this? Are you processing the implications of this?
And it's not just in the USA.
They're doing the same thing in Italy...
And in Germany...
And in the UK...
They're doing the same thing everywhere.
And it's increasing the so-called "fatality count"... massively. It's nowhere near what they're telling you on the TV. It's probably less than the seasonal flu.
Yes. LESS THAN THE FLU.
Here is the Great Esteemed and Unquestionable Dr. Fauci admitting it:
And the chair of the Health Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe:
And a Stanford University professor of epidemiology:
Here's a list of 12 prominent epidemiologists saying the same or similar things:
The common thread is that we overreacted to a virus with a fatality rate similar to that of the seasonal flu.
If you get this virus, your chances of survival are the same, and perhaps BETTER THAN,
the seasonal flu.
"But people are dying in hospitals! I see it on the news!"
Please see the section on media tricks.
Here's a pretty picture. Stare at it and let that stress out. Deep breaths. In and out.
Feel better? :)
"Wait! We're not done yet! I still have more ammo!
How about overall excess deaths? Those are up this year! More people are dying, overall, than in previous years! That HAS to be from COVID19!"
Again, being science-minded, we have to ask, "Are there confounding variables here?"
Even if the increase is a real thing, we don't know how much of it comes from the novelty and virulence of the new virus, vs. how much comes from policy-induced collective immuno-suppression.
And there are many such variables:
1. Nursing home slaughter.
Several U.S. governors, (those of California, New York, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey) sent infected patients into nursing homes, in complete contravention to well-established protocols for those facilities.
Even in normal years, colds and flu can kill many people in nursing homes, because of how frail they tend to be. Even if someone has a common cold, they should not be sent into a nursing home. In normal years, even common cold patients are isolated from those facilities.
Yet these governors sent coronavirus patents in.
According to some estimates, this move could have let to over half of the total estimated "death toll."
And they were all in the 5 states that had the "worst outbreaks."
Seeing the big picture yet?
2. Ventilator slaughter.
Let's use our heads. If you:
A. Shove a tube down someone's throat
B. Immobilize them for weeks at a time
C. Pump them with narcotics for weeks at a time
D. Muscles atrophy
E. Circulation plummets
F. Organs shut down
G. Vital functions erode
H. The body breaks down
Just from the intubation.
A person wouldn't need to even have a "virus" in order for such a treatment to kill them.
Ventilators have been likened to manslaughter.
How many "Covid fatalities" are really intubation fatalities?
3. Sudden Induced Poverty
If you force an entire country into sudden unemployment, what happens?
How does poverty impact public health?
How does sudden, mass poverty impact public health?
If public health is decreased, what results can be expected?
How much of the overall increase in deaths in recent months are from the cascading effects of sudden mass-poverty?
It's estimated that for every 1% increase in unemployment, there is a corresponding % increase in suicide.
How might that be affecting the numbers?
Did your news reports mention this? Did they attempt to hash this out?
5. Deferred care.
In March and April, hospitals closed themselves off to non-coronavirus healthcare. People with cancer, heart disease, kidney disease, liver disease, and other problems had to postpone their care.
Even after the rules eased and these patients were allowed to return, many chose to stay away anyway, due to fear induced by the media.
How many of the "overall excess deaths" came from the postponing of non-covid medical care?
6. Social isolation.
It has long been known that our health is impacted by our social lives. Loneliness causes immuno-suppression.
Some elderly people have not had any human contact since February.
If there is an increase in the severity of symptoms of infectious disease, how much of that increase might be due to immuno-suppression from locking people in their homes, cancelling social events, closing public spaces, and making people "socially distance" and avoid visiting their friends and families?
7. Forbidden exercise.
Exercise is essential to health. Including immune system health.
But once lockdowns started, exercise was essentially forbidden. Gyms were forcefully closed. Athletic tracks were forcefully closed. Pepole were arrested for surfing. People were harassed by police for jogging.
What do you think happens to public health when entire populations are forbidden from exercising?
8. Forbidden sunlight.
Sunshine is essential for immune health.
People were threatened with fines for going outside.
What happens to public health when you keep a population indoors, during the beautiful days of spring, away from sunlight, and glued to their TV's?
9. Extreme fear and stress.
Our bodies are designed to respond to fear by pumping blood away from internal organs, and toward our extremities. (This helped us run from tigers, in our evolutionary past).
And if you keep people white-knuckle-terrified for months at a time, all that blood stays in the extremities, and the internal organs suffer. Many bodily-sustenance functions drop. Tissue is not repaired. Enzymes are not produced.
What do you think happens to public health when you've got people terrified for months?
10. Forced muzzling.
There is a reason we haven't worn face-masks as our default apparel for the past 200,000 years.
A. They decrease oxygen intake (even leading some people to faint).
B. They increase CO2 inhalation, lowering the pH (acidifying) the bloodstream.
C. They create warm, moist reservoirs of microbes, right in front of the mouth.
D. They force the re-inhalation of exhaled virions, increasing viral load.
With all of these factors going on, how can you be sure that "excess deaths" are caused simply by "the virus"?
"I guess I can't."
"But it's surging again!"
Because testing is surging.
"But the tests are PICKING UP cases, dummy!"
The more tests you administer, the more cases you're going to detect. It doesn't mean that anything is "increasing."
Imagine if we did this with tests for blood type.
Let's say we're testing for Type-B blood.
Today, we administer 10 tests, and get 1 positive. (1 person with Type-B blood).
Next week, we administer 100 tests, and get 10 positives (10 people with Type-B blood).
The following week, 1000 tests, and 100 positives.
The week after that, 10,000 tests, and 1,000 positives.
Then 100,000 tests, and 10,000 positives.
Newspaper articles could then be written with titles like:
"Type-B Blood Increasing by 10x per week!"
"Type-B Blood Spreading Like Wildfire!"
And more articles asking, desperately:
"What's causing this epidemic of Type-B blood?"
Yes, this is comically un-scientific, and yet it's exactly what they've done with "Covid-19" testing.
And your oligarch "news" is mentioning NOTHING of this to you.
"Well OK, I admit... this... does cast doubt on the honesty of our medical establishment. But still, if all those people have the virus, that's still a problem! You can't say it's not a problem."
Sure we can. It's not a problem. It's the opposite of a problem. The more cases there are, the lower the fatality rate.
Do you know how the fatality rate is calculated?
"Hmm... I'm guessing it would be... the total number of fatalities divided by the total number of caes?"
If the number of fatalities stays the same (and it is...)
...and the number of hospitalizations stays the same (and it is... and we know because the hospitals are still not overcrowded, as plenty of citizen journalists have documented)...
...but at the same time, the number of cases is increasing...
...then this is not cause for alarm. It's cause for celebration. Because It means the CFR (case fatality rate) is getting lower and lower.
The more you increase the denominator (the number on the bottom of the fraction), the smaller the quotient (the answer) gets.
Increasing the denominator decreases the quotient.
More cases (but same amount of fatalities and hospitalizations) means lower rates of fatalities and hospitalizations.
"Ah, I see how that works. So it's not as deadly as we thought, because more people have gotten it than we thought."
"How much more, I wonder."
Good thing to ask. It might be... a lot more.
According to the W.H.O., 2% - 3% of the entire world population has already been infected (and most didn't even realize they had it).
That's 156 million to 234 million people. Already infected. With most not noticing it.
That WHO estimate was announced on April 20th. Let's check the "official case count" from CNN for April 20th:
2.4 million cases, CNN says.
How badly is CNN under-counting cases, according to this W.H.O. study??
Let's divide 156 million by 2.4 million.
That's 65 times.
And for 234 million?
That's 98 times!
That means that (as of April 20th), the real case-count was 65-98 times greater than the officially reported case-count.
Where are we getting this figure? Here:
Don't just read the title. Read the article. The article says the opposite of what the title says. (A standard trick in sensationalist journalism).
The text of the article says that 2% - 3% of the entire world population has antibodies! That's not "a few." That's 65-98 times the official case count!
Why did The Guardian lie in its article title?
Which means that the real denominator is not 10 times more than the officially reported one - it's 65-98 times more.
Which of course means that the quotient - the fatality rate for COVID19 - is 65-98 times lower than the official figure.
Need more evidence?
Check these out:
Netherlands: The Dutch National Institute for Health conducted an antibody study and showed 3% of their 17 million population likely has had the virus.
Sweden: A random sampling of 100 people at a blood bank showed at least 11% had antibodies.
Note: You'll need Google Translate for that.
Italy: A random sampling at a blood bank showed 40 out of 60 people had antibodies. That's 67%!
Boston - Massachusetts General Hospital conducted a test of 200 passersby in one area and found a 3rd had antibodies.
Also in Boston- a Homeless shelter tested all 397 people and a 146 tested positive for the virus. None showed any symptoms thus far.
In Finland - The actual number of people infected with the new coronavirus may be dozens of times higher than the number of laboratory-confirmed infections, reports the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL).
These articles support the thesis that the denominator is greatly suppressed, and therefore, the quotient (the death rate) is greatly inflated.
Also: Notice how these articles are trying to spin these findings as scary, because it means there are "so many cases out there" - and conveniently forgetting to explain how it means that the death rate is lower (because of the deflated denominator).
Why do they want you to be more afraid of something that they, as journalists, just figured out, is less dangerous?
Is this a simple failure of logic on their part? Or is it perhaps on purpose?
Anyway, the point is, mainstream official publications are confirming what we're saying here.
We don't need to use "unofficial" sources.
We don't need to rely on any "conspiracy websites."
We don't need any sources besides the official ones.
We can use the same sources as everyone else. We can use the WHO, the CDC, Fauci, Birx, and all of those familiar names.
The fatality rate is much, much lower
than they've reported.
And this is after just one type of number-cooking! There are waaaay more!
Like, for instance, the fact that they've been restricting testing to only those cases that are the most severe - the most likely to result in fatality. They say, "If you're not sick enough to go to the hospital, you don't need a test."
So they're skewing their tests specifically toward those people who have the highest probability of severe symptoms and fatality. Does that sound "scientific" to you?
It's kind of like conducting a political poll on the issue of "gun control"... while standing in the parking lot of of a gun store.
The complete opposite of scientific.
Still don't believe us because we're just a random website on the internet? Ok. Here's a doctor (Dr. Jay Bhattacharya) talking about this idea:
And if you're short on time, here's briefer article of a Stanford Professor saying the same thing:
(Not a "random schmuck with a Facebook page" - a Stanford Professor!)
OK, now here's a pretty picture you can look at while you breathe easier than you've breathed in weeks:
The Correct Response
(not a fake one)
"Well this is all very interesting. It seems something is "off" about the narrative.
But we should still follow the recommendations - like wearing masks and staying home. It will save some lives. Even if it's just a few lives... even 1 life is worth it!"
Did you say that last year?
"No. There wasn't a deadly virus last year."
Is the flu not deadly?
"Ok OK I see your point. And I say... Perhaps we SHOULD do masks and lockdowns every year! It could lessen the impact of the flu! What have we got to lose?"
Are you implying that there is "nothing to lose" from enacting highly restrictive, intrusive rules, and shutting down many of society's vital systems?
"Well, obviously it does come with its costs... but those costs are obviously worth it! We know they're worth it, because the SCIENTISTS say so!"
These "scientists" suffer from a fundamentally un-balanced way of thinking, and this coronavirus situation has brought it into focus like never before. They are very skillful at memorizing data and following rulebooks, but they have no idea how to synthesize information and look at the "big picture."
They specialize in one narrow field, and make all of their recommendations based on the conclusions of that one field, without taking any input from any other fields into account. They don't know (or care) how their policies affect the rest of society's systems.
They are stuck in their left-brain-hemispheres, and disconnected from their right-brain-hemispheres - unable to think non-linearly.
If you're looking at this situation purely from the perspective of an epidemiologist, then the most logical course of action would be to have complete martial-law, with troops in the streets and no one allowed out of their homes for any reason, forever. As long as germs exist, no human being should have contact with another human being.
Since most epidemiologists have at least some awareness of realty beyond their field, very few would suggest such a regime in its entirety - yet many have come uncomfortably close.
And the result is that they have essentially initiated a non-consensual chemotherapy on the entire world.
In chemotherapy, the goal is to kill everything - including the patient - but hope that the cancer cells die just a little bit faster. If everything goes well, they can abort the treatment while the patient is still only partially killed.
And is that not what the medical bureaucrats have enacted upon the planet in 2020?
Lockdowns destroy society, and the human spirit, and all systems of the body - including the immune system. They create mass-trauma and hysteria, which throws the body and mind out of balance, leaving us less healthy and more vulnerable to disease..
Lockdowns are meant to destroy society and everything in it - while hoping that the virus gets destroyed a little bit faster.
Chemo is bad enough when it's consensual. But now they're imposing it upon all of us - by force.
And forced medical treatment is a violation of both the Nuremberg Protocols (the standards under which captured Nazi officials were put on trial) and the Geneva Convention.
These people are sick. And they have to be stopped.
They're like drunks with car keys. We have to take the keys away from them, before they destroy everything and everyone.
"I've taken note of all of the emotional and statistical tricks and shenanigans that our governments and media have been using to pump up the fear around this virus. I'm open to the idea that it's not nearly as "dangerous" as they've been telling us.
But what should we do if a *real* pandemic shows up? Like... in the future? What actually *is* the right way to respond to a pandemic - like, a real one?"
A mature civilization has contingency plans for major situations. And we should have one for biological situations.
We should be prepared, and have a plan to respond. Sanely.
Without muzzling people and locking us all in our houses.
Believing that the answer to any health question is for "authority figures" to control every person and every space at all times, is not only monstrous, but completely ineffectual, and illustrates the failure of the technocratic paradigm.
The proper response to a pandemic is health.
The Earth Party's
Pandemic Contingency Response Plan
Resolve to follow LOGIC - not emotion.
Emotional responses are not useful in these situations. In fact, they're dangerous. More dangerous even than the initial crisis itself.
In any difficult situation, not least this one, we get into trouble when we base our responses on emotion. Panic always leads to trouble. It doesn't solve the problem. It causes chaos. It may make things even worse. No matter what the crisis is - whether it's economic, geopolitical, or biological - leading with emotions is not helpful.
We can (and should) be learning from our past. There have been previous instances, where countries have fallen into emotional panic as a result of a crisis, and the panic causes far more damage than the crisis itself.
One example of this is 9/11. Remember that?
We don't want to act hysterically the way we did then, again.
If anyone tries to silence debate, or shame anyone for trying to calmly and rationally approach the situation, and tries to spread emotional hysteria to bypass all logic, then we need to confront that person, and expose what they're doing.
DO NOT allow them to control the debate.
Choose the correct paradigm of medicine.
Teach the public how the immune system works.
Provide proper nutrition to those without access
Teach meditation and self-healing
Mitigate unnecessary sources of stress
Restore natural social units with multiple layers of self-sufficiency.
Other helpful things:
-Provide voluntary centers of self-quarantine for people who believe themselves to be extra-vulnerable (perhaps due to immuno-suppression), and allow them to "wait it out" there, with all food and basic supplies provided to them, free of charge, by the government, for the duration of the pandemic. Each city can rent out a large hotel building for this purpose.
-Provide delivery of food and basic supplies to the homes of the vulnerable who choose to stay in their own homes, so they don't need to venture out.
-Prosecute executives at tech companies who censor information relating to health (or any info, really).
Notice what's not on the list?
-Arresting people for normal activities
-24/7 fear-porn "news reports" of real-time carnage numbers
Because these things don't work. They're not scientific. There is no scientific evidence to suggest that lockdowns are beneficial whatsoever.
We can obviously surmise that lockdowns slow transmission of pathogens, yes - but we cannot surmise that that transmission decrease is worth the overall reduction in health that comes from completely shutting down society.
We know paranoia decreases transmission - but it also decreases health. Including immune health - which is... kinda important, if you're actually in a pandemic, right?
Is there any evidence that the benefits of the former eclipse the drawbacks of the latter?
No. There is no such evidence. Such draconian experiments have never been done before in the entire history of humanity.
Thus, there is zero scientific study on them, and zero scientific evidence to support them.
Yet our governments did them anyway. Because the whole thing is not about a virus. It's about something else.
It's Not About a Virus
If you believe that this whole fiasco is really about a "virus" - if you still believe that - and more importantly, if you think your government and media really believe it - that this is all about a "virus" - then you need to answer some questions:
If it's really about a "virus", then why hasn't anyone on TV mentioned the immune system at any point in the entire 7-month (and counting) ordeal?
Why hasn't anyone in government mentioned it?
Why aren't they explaining, to the public, how the immune system works?
They know the public is woefully uneducated about health and biology.
So why aren't they trying to fix that?
They have our attention. Millions of people are now completely captive to their TV's, and listen all day long for news about the "pandemic."
So why don't they use that attention to actually do some good, and teach people something, instead of just spreading fear all day?
And why haven't they mentioned nutrition?
Why aren't they talking about the relationship between nutrition and immunity?
Isn't the immune system kind of... important... in a "pandemic"?
It's not like these "doctors" and healthcare bureaucrats "don't know" how it works. They know.
They know that nutrition affects the performance of the immune system, and they know that the immune system is the primary determinant of the outcome of infectious diseases.
So why aren't they talking about it?
They know that malnutrition is a problem, especially in America, where a large chunk of the population cannot afford healthy, nutritious food, and is immuno-suppressed as a result. They know that many poor areas don't even have access to real food, since they live in Food Deserts.
They buy their groceries at the gas station, or the liquor store, because there are no supermarkets.
And their options basically amount to white bread, pasta, canned food, and candy.
Even if they had a little money to spare, they would have to travel to an entirely different neighborhood, in order to even real food.
They have no access to broccoli, blueberries, blackberries, kale, carrots, celery... or anything with actual nutrition in it.
When you don't get proper nutrition, and you're eating cheese and bread and refined sugar and all the preservatives and chemical garbage that's in this stuff... your immune system is weak, and you're more vulnerable.
Notice how the news is telling you things like: "African Americans are hit worse by the virus..."
Of course they are - they're impoverished and live in food deserts without access to real food, and their immune systems are compromised as a result!
Yet that article above contains ZERO mentions of nutrition. Don't believe that? Read it yourself. See? No mention of nutrition. In the entire thing.
So, why aren't we helping them out? Why aren't we addressing their nutritional problems?
If you were directing a national pandemic response, wouldn't your first action be to set up a program to begin immediately delivering proper nutrition to food deserts, and to poor people, to make sure that their immune systems can actually function?
Why isn't the government doing this?
It's not like it would be "costly" or "difficult." The states have called up the National Guard. Guard units could distribute healthy food to poor neighborhoods. It would be very easy to do, and very cheap. This is not high technology we're talking about. This is fruits and veggies.
Come on people. This isn't exactly an Apollo Mission.
How much would it cost to deliver fruits and veggies to all the poor people?
A billion dollars?
5 billion at the most?
Zero billion, because the National Guard is already activated, and could do it as a part of their actual job?
As far as actually buying the food - how much would it cost to purchase 50 million florets of broccoli per week? How much is a floret of broccoli?
Three dollars? Two dollars?
One dollar, if you buy at scale?
So that's like... 100 million dollars a week. For the whole country. Million, not billion.
Repeat with carrots, celery, bell peppers, blueberries, blackberries, peaches, apples, bananas, oranges... you get the point.
Suppose we did twenty types - 10 veggies and 10 fruits - to every American who can't afford them - that's 2 billion dollars a week.
For 2 billion dollars a week - maybe 3 billion if you throw in gasoline for the Guard vehicles - we could fix America's nutrition problem and set up the primary foundation of all defense against viruses.
3 billion a week is too much?
No. The price tag is not the reason they aren't doing it.
They're spending so much money on:
-PPE (masks and gloves and hazmat suits)
-Millions and millions of testing kits
-Armies of contact-tracers
That stuff alone is running into the hundreds of billions.
And that doesn't even include the financial toll of the economic destruction are they causing by shutting everything down.
Something's not adding up. The thing preventing a nutrition program is definitely NOT the price tag.
And it's not because they "don't know" how important nutrition is. They know. They know nutrition is the foundation of health. And if they don't, they shouldn't even be doctors, let alone be directing a national pandemic response. They need to go back to school, and get off of television, immediately.
And where is Dr. Fauci?
Is he talking about this?
No, he's not.
Has even mentioned it? Even once?
The word "nutrition", has not emerged from his lips throughout the entire time he's been at that podium.
It would be one thing if he said "Let's get some nutritious food to people who don't currently have access to it, so they can build proper immune systems", but then failed to convince Congress to provide the funding to do so.
That would be one thing. But that's not what happened. He hasn't tried. He hasn't even mentioned it.
Meanwhile, Youtube will censor YOU if YOU mention it.
Out of all the times when fostering immune health would be important, a "pandemic" would be the time. So why isn't ANYONE in charge of the response talking about it?
No one in the "mainstream" can answer this.
But we can.
Follow the Earth Party on Twitter:
And then, the protests.
If this was about a virus, why are they endorsing and encouraging street protests?
And not just encouraging - but participating in them!
Why is it that the same governors and mayors who say "Stay shut in your house or we'll take you straight to jail!" are simultaneously encouraging people to go out and protest in large crowds where social distancing is impossible?
Racism is certainly a problem, but is it a "monster pandemic that will wipe out hundreds of millions of people within a year", and in which even a single transmission could spell the difference between controlling it and losing control?
Statues of slaveholders may indeed be a problem, and it may be long past time for them to come down - but is that more important than the "worst pandemic in a hundred years?"
They've told us this "virus" is so bad that we have to:
-Set up internal checkpoints between states...
-Forbid indoor gatherings, under force of law...
...all under force of law...
-Set up an army of contact tracers...
-Force people to get "tested"...
-Force muzzles on people...
-Mandate forced quarantines...
It's so "bad", that USA Today just ran a frightening editorial advocating for universal forced vaccination of every man, woman, and child, by force, breaching the most sacred barrier of privacy, and placing the human body itself under the proprietorship of the government.
There is only one explanation left:
They don't want us to be healthy. They actually want a pandemic.
They actually want our immune systems to be compromised and suppressed, so that more will get sick and die, so that they will have an excuse to lock everything down, keep us divided and isolated, and suppress the Revolution in Human Consciousness that they know is imminent.
That's why every aspect of their response has been something that erodes health.
They're trying to engineer a public health crisis. ON PURPOSE.
It's that bad, but simultaneously not bad enough to discourage street protests?
It's bad enough to warrant the sudden creation of the most advanced iteration of totalitarian control the world has ever seen... but not bad enough to postpone bronze-statue removal?
It's bad enough to accuse the anti-lockdown protesters of late April and early May of being "mass-murderers" for daring to show up in public, but not bad enough to make the same accusation about crowds that are a hundred times the size, ten times the density, and a thousand times more chaotic?
It's bad enough to ban singing, but not bad enough to ban protest chants?
Bad enough to ban visiting businesses, but not bad enough to ban smashing and looting them?
Bad enough to ban entry to public buildings, but not bad enough to ban storming them and setting them on fire?
Is this Schrodinger's Virus? Does it exist in a state of quantum superposition, where it's simultaneously highly contagious and not contagious at all, depending on which side of the political spectrum is flaunting it?
Is it intelligent? Does it know the difference between a protester with a valid cause and a protester with an invalid cause?
These questions should prove, not only that there is no "pandemic", but that the people "in charge" don't believe there's one either.
Even Anthony Fauci doesn't believe in the pandemic.
Even the publisher of the Imperial Model - the original "doom and gloom" projection upon which the harsh worldwide lockdowns of March and April were originally based - doesn't believe in his own research.
If he does believe in it, then why did he invite his mistress over to his house at the height of his country's lockdown - even after he had "tested positive"?
Why was MSNBC's Chris Cuomo spotted out jogging while he was pretending to be self-isolating after "testing positive"? And why did he get so angry at being called out, that he became belligerent with the bystander who called him out? And why did he later lie about the whole thing?
If haircuts transmit the virus enough to ban haircuts, why did the mayor of Chicago keep getting haircuts after threatening her city's residents with arrest if they got haircuts?
Why isn't this rat bastard wearing his mask?
Why do the TV crews wear masks while filming, and then take them off as soon as they think the cameras are off?
And here he is doing it too!
As soon as the cameras are off!
And then there's the censorship.
We have been told that scientific and medical misinformation is so dangerous that we must consent, not only to the forceful censorship of non-credentialed opinions (i.e. non-professionals), but to the censorship of board-certified, practicing doctors who dispute elements of the narrative - even those who have been treating coronavirus patients since this began.
Yet at the same time, Bill Gates - a non-doctor - is given platform after platform, to talk about his views on virology, immunology, and epidemiology, despite having no medical degree and ZERO credentials in any scientific discipline whatsoever.
Why are America's Frontline Doctors deleted from Youtube and suspended from Twitter, even though they've been treating coronavirus patients up close and personally... while a monopolistic computer CEO, whose signature invention was the world's most glitchy and virus-prone operating system, is heralded as a medical authority on viruses by every major TV network and newspaper?
Why is he being asked about public policies regarding public health? Why are his "predictions" being aired? Why isn't he facing censorship, while actual scientists are?
3: Deliberately Engineering A Public Health Crisis
-Lack of exercise
-Lack of sunlight
-Lack of social contact
...all have in common?
They all suppress the immune system.
It's long been known that loneliness suppresses the immune system...
... and loneliness leads to depression, which also suppresses the immune system.
Yet they want us sitting home, not going to work, and doing nothing.
And sunlight is essential to the immune system:
Yet they're ordering us to get as little of it as possible.
"Whatever you do, do NOT get sunlight, unless you absolutely HAVE to. Sincerely, your Governor."
Yea yea, exercising is permitted. But you better be careful it's not non-essential exercise.
If you mess up... you can go to jail for a year.
Best to just stay inside, and not press your luck.
And even if you decide to defy the governors, and get your exercise anyway, they've taken steps to make that very, very difficult.
They've locked the gates to the fields...
They've posted signs on the hiking trails, informing you that you could be arrested for hiking. Not a very peaceful hike, eh?
Why do this? Why close hiking trails?
Do trees transmit viruses?
Isn't hiking in the wilderness the #1 most social-distancy thing a person can do?
It's also jut about the healthiest thing you can do. Fresh air, being in nature, being around trees - it's all essential. Especially now, when health is so important. Tons of scientific studies confirm this.
As if we needed science to confirm something so obvious.
And yet, they don't want us doing it. They're threatening us with arrest if we do.
Why ban surfing? Why ban kayaking? What do these solitary forms of recreation have to do with stopping transmission of a virus?
Why ban people from beaches?
Could it have something to do with sunlight - the main natural source of Vitamin D, which is essential to the immune system, and which they don't want us obtaining?
What did banning the sale of garden seeds have to do with stopping a virus?
Yes, you could be getting your hands in the soil, reconnecting with Nature, getting sunshine, and growing your own food, complete with all the vitamins and nutrients and phytonutrients, straight from the Earth - the healthiest stuff you could possibly eat!
Getting your hands in the dirt for a little time each day, are much healthier, mentally and physically. All sorts of scientific studies confirm this.
Yet they tried to stop us from doing this. From doing ALL of this.
Do you get it yet?
This isn't about stopping a virus.
This is about stopping you from being healthy.
They may have backed down - somewhat - after facing armed resistance - but when their "second wave" gets going, you can be they'll try to do it all over again.
Why would they want to do this?
Why engineer a public health crisis on purpose?
But that they don't want you doing that. They don't want you doing ANYTHING that could help your health, or strengthen your immune system.
Instead, they want you stuck inside, on your sofa, alone, watching TV, and shivering in fear, as your Vitamin D plummets from lack of sunshine, leaving you more vulnerable to infections.
Just stay in your house, on your couch, terrified!
And that's another thing that assaults the immune system:
This isn't woo woo. This is science. Anxiety sends blood to the extremities - the arms, legs, hands, and feet.
That's because, in our evolutionary past, anxiety usually meant there was something to run from. A lion, tiger, a pack of wolves, and so on. So blood goes to the extremities so that you can use them to run really fast, and climb stuff to get out of the way.
So when you're chronically anxious, all that blood is going to your extremities, instead of from your internal organs. Thus, they can't function optimally, and thus, health decreases, and with it, your immune system.
And yet, what is the media doing all day long, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week?
Pumping everyone with industrial strength FEAR.
24 hours a day. 7 days a week.
On your couch. Shivering with fear.
Sending all that blood to your limbs, away from your organs.
Chronically wearing down your immune system.
That. Is. What. They. ***WANT***.
They want the numbers high, so they can justify keeping the charade going.
But that's not all. It gets even more sinister.
Governments in some places are deliberately increasing the carnage, by:
-Sending sick patients to nursing homes (the flu, and even the common cold, can kill people in nursing homes).
-Killing patients with ventilators (and governments paying doctors to do it)
* * *
To get a coherent picture of how all of these components fit together, we've put together a tongue-in-cheek presentation called:
A User's Guide to Medical Psyop Construction
* * *
The fact that they're doing all of this should tell you that this is not about protecting people form a "virus." This is about control.
This is about using the fear of a virus to manufacture consent for the abolition of rights and the consolidation of more power by the oligarchy.
And the powers they're demanding this time are absolutely staggering, dwarfing the goals of any previous psychological operation.
The formula this time, like all previous psyops, is simple:
1. Decide what you want - what structural changes you'd like to make to society.
2. Think up a problem for which those changes could be presented as a solution. (They don't even have to really be solutions - they just have to be presentable to an underinformed populace as solutions).
3. Create that problem. (And if you can't create an actual, real one, then use the mass-media to create the perception of one).
In other words, you scare people, make them cry out for safety, and them offer them that safety in the form of the structural changes you've been itching to make all along.
What changes are the oligarchs seeking?
The structural change they're seeking through "Covid" is the abolition of key rights (like Assembly and Speech), and centralization of power into the so-called "scientific community", which is un-elected, unchecked by the People, and reports directly to the corporate oligarchs who provide its financing.
They are seeking a world of absolute control, wherein the government (and increasingly un-elected scientist-bureaucrats) can:
-Have access-on-demand to the inside of your veins (mandatory injections)
-Have access-on-demand to the inside of your nasal passages (mandatory testing)
-Arrest you, at any time, and hold you as long as they like (no more habeas corpus), under the guise of "quarantining"
-Go into homes and take children away from parents
-Censor the internet (under the guise of "protecting the public from harmful misinformation)
-Cancel protests and force populations back into their houses at any time
-Trace and track all movements of every person, in real-time, 24/7, everywhere
-Create a "snitching" culture
-Recruit a new "Medical Police" force (and gradually give it more and more powers, until it's actually an army of medical stormtroopers)
-Close borders and set up vast arrays of checkpoints at transportation hubs, decide who can and can't travel, decide when you can and can't travel, and begin the process of phasing-out the concept of liberal travel and tourism (at least for non-elite people, and people who refuse mandated injections)
-Microchip the human population (under the guise of storing immunization data)
-Create a "Social Credit Score" linked to the chip
-Abolish cash, and make all transactions chip-based
-Begin merging humanity with A.I.
There are also a few other "perks" from secondary effects of lockdowns:
-Bankruptcy of small businesses and assimilation into established corporate chains
-The takeover of retail distribution by Bezos (who owns the WaPo, a key trumpeter of covid hysteria), as stores close and people rely on "Prime" for their basic necessities
-Hundreds of billions of dollars in profit for vaccine-manufacturers, with William Gates III possibly becoming the world's first singular trillionaire
-The replacement of traditional elections by postal elections. (If you're not sure how or why default postal elections threaten democracy, just ask yourself why we haven't been doing it for the past 240 years, and you'll start to figure out the reasons).
And have all of these decisions at the discretion of un-elected bureaucrats in labcoats, who owe their careers to their financiers in the corporate oligarchy.
Mass-panic psyops are a time-tested tool of the corporate oligarchy, and questioning them always seems dangerous, heretical, and crazy while we're in the midst of them.
There might really be a new virus. In fact, there probably is. But there are always new viruses. Every year, there are hundreds of new ones. That's why the flu keeps coming back every year, and why the common cold keeps coming back, again and again.
What If the "Pandemic" WERE Real?
Of If *Another* One Comes Along That's Real?
Even in the case of a *real* pandemic, the responses chosen by most governments are completely useless, and actually counterproductive and harmful.
If there were a real pandemic, medical authoritarianism would make it worse, not better.
Lockdowns destroy society, and the human spirit, and all systems of the body - including the immune system. They create mass-trauma and hysteria, which throws the body and mind out of balance, leaving us more vulnerable to pathogens.
Wearing masks, as a healthy person, decreases your health, and leaves you more vulnerable to pathogens.
The proper response to a pandemic is health.
But even the doctors - even the well-meaning doctors - are ignorant about all of this, because they've been taught a false medical paradigm by Rockefeller academia.
Education provides opportunities for learning - but also for brainwashing. The more time someone has spent in "education", the more things they know - but some of those things could be false.
And it shows, all over the place.
Believing that the answer to any health question is for "authority figures" to control every person and every space at all times, is not only monstrous, but completely ineffectual, and illustrates the failure of the technocratic paradigm.
This whole "Covid' mess is really a struggle between health paradigms - the ultimate manifestation of that struggle - and hopefully its climax.
For decades, we tolerated the dominance of false medicine, because at least we still had choice.
But now, they're coming for our choice. The false paradigm seeks to impose itself utterly, on every person, as a permanent medical techno-fascist dictatorship. We cannot allow it to continue any longer.
They've seized absolute control - but they've also come out into the light. They've revealed themselves, like the final form of a final boss in a video game. All pretenses are dropped. We are staring directly into the eyes of the monster, and humanity is waking up to the fact that it was a monster all along.
If we are vigilant and brave, the "coronavirus" will not be the crowning achievement of the false paradigm, but its fall, and the beginning of a new age of true health.
These are choices that governments have made that are inconsistent with the choices a government would make, if there was really a pandemic. They're doing things that they wouldn't do in a pandemic, and declining to do things that they would do in a pandemic.
Here is what a proper pandemic response looks like. They're not doing any of what's on that list.
Meanwhile, there is one type of situation with which their actions are entirely consistent: that of suppressing an impending revolution.
Lockdown - also known as "martial law" - is what you do to suppress a revolution.
Combination of hoax 80-90% through statistical tricks, and 10-20% real but engineered.
The engineered portion can be further broken down into half by accident (people knowing nothing about health, or being too poor to afford proper nutrition and access to Nature), and half deliberate, by governments, through a system of frontal assault on public health, disguised as "transmission reduction" - aka the Policy-Sickness Feedback Loop.
Perhaps a small sliver of the mayhem is actually just organically coming from a virus - perhaps it's really divergent - more divergent than most other novel coronaviruses, in a way that we have a lower-than-usual amount of immunity to. Because it's so different.
But different only means worse because we're not used to it. Once it has made its round through the population, we will develop that immunity, and it will be just a common cold - just like the others - because that may really be what it is. A common cold. Just one we aren't used to, and don't have immunity to. Yet.
And this is a hypothesis with a basis in science.
Whatever it is, even if it's real and highly novel, the fact remains (and endless data supports) that it is easily prophylacted by simple and basic nutrition and health-cultivation. The reason so many people are getting so sick is because they're not taking care of their basic health, and the government is making zero attempts to help them start. Its response is solely limited to making us wear face-diapers and closing businesses down and atomizing us into social isolation - and eventually injecting us with Bill Gates' bio-equivalent of Windows Update.
Even the well-meaning Fauci-worshippers are focusing entirely on interrupting transmission of the virus between bodies - on erecting divisions between us - while having absolutely nothing to say about strengthening the health of our bodies to respond adequately to viruses once they jump those divisions. It's a strange thing to leave out.
But it's entirely in line with the false paradigm of technocratic medicalism.
The entire covid thing is a giant exposure of the flaws in that paradigm... the ultimate confrontation between true medicine and the technocratic quackery that has hijacked the field through billionaire money disguised as philanthropy since the time of Rockefeller.
Covid-19 is a psyop. Its purpose is to win the population's consent for expansions of governmental and corporate power.
This is not new. It has happened before (and felt just as real that time). There might really be a "novel coronavirus." But it is not a "monster pandemic."
Evidence that the "Pandemic" is a Hoax
The evidence falls into four categories:
-deliberate exacerbation by government policy
-and creepy coincidences.
* * * * *
The tricks fall into two categories: statistical and
The same way a clever tax attorney can manipulate numbers to lower a client's taxes, a clever statistician can use statistical accounting tricks to produce a narrative to manipulate public perception.
Especially if they're working in concert with a government that's willing to impose policies to produce more results in line with the desired agenda.
Ways that are currently being used include:
-Counting all fatalities as "Covid" fatalities, regardless of what the patient actually died from
-Paying hospitals extra money to "diagnose" it, even without testing
-Using only confirmed (i.e. tested) cases in the denominator of the fatality rate equation, massively suppressing the denominator, and thus massively increasing the quotient
-Selection bias in testing, weighted heavily towards people who are severely symptomatic, without attempting any correction to these stats when reporting them on TV
All of these items are explained in detail on our expanded presentation:
That's the statistical side. Now the emotional side:
This is all about outlier hyperfocus - the most notorious trick in the toolbox of any "news" outfit.
Its mechanism is simple. By focusing lots of attention on a small number of incidents, the media can create a public perception that those incidents are much more common than they really are. A clever media campaign can make outliers look like norms.
-Patients dying in hospitals
-Exhausted medical staff
-Doctors and nurses dying
-Anonymous burials at New York City's Hart Island
All of these things happen every year, in the normal course of operation. If it's not happening at one hospital, it's happening at another. In a country of millions of people (and a world with billions), you can always find some places that are having these problems.
And once you find them, you can focus the news cameras on them and broadcast their footage and stories with such intensity, and such ubiquity, that it makes these phenomena look like... a... "pandemic."
We have debunked each of those scary "narrative elements" in our expanded presentation:
Now ask yourself:
If it's really as super-duper serious as they claim it is, would they need to use so many tricks to make us fear it?
The fact that the "authorities" are willing to torpedo their own long-term credibility by performing so many tricks, and such silly ones at that, in broad daylight, means that they needed them. The plan wouldn't have worked without them. Without tricks, the public would not have bought in to the pandemic narrative.
They're obviously not confident in their ability to convince us with regular, un-manipulated facts.
And the next question:
"Is there even a novel coronavirus at all?"
This is the wrong question to ask. Because even if there is, that doesn't mean anything significant, by itself, because there are always novel coronaviruses emerging.
Every year. Constantly.
That's what viruses do. They invent new versions of themselves. They're always doing this. That's why flu and common colds keep coming back year after year.
A "novel coronavirus" is not a "novel" thing.
But most of the public doesn't know this, because most people don't know the first thing about how viruses work. Most people have no idea that the human body contains over 300 trillion virions at any given time, from thousands of different virus species (many of them coronaviruses), in a rich and complex and interconnected ecosystem called a virome, which plays a vital role in many bodily functions, similar to gut bacteria, and without which we wouldn't even exist.
Most people have no idea that viruses don't destroy cells or tissue on their own, and that "symptoms" are caused by our own bodies' immune reaction to them - a process called a cytokine storm, which causes the inflammation that causes sickness.
Most people have no idea that the immune system consists of multiple lines of defense, of which the dangerous cytokine storm is only the last line, and that with proper nutrition and basic health cultivation, the initial defense lines (macrophages and T-cells) can easily keep viral load under control, and prevent any need for cytokines. They have no idea that their immune systems are currently doing this, right now, with thousands of different kinds of viruses.
Most people have no idea what the term "viral load" even means, and assume that inhaling a single virion means "You're Fucked."
In the midst of what the governments are calling "a pandemic", there is absolutely, positively, ZERO attempt by said governments to teach anyone about how viruses work. Zero attempt to create an informed, empowered citizenry that knows even how NUTRITION works.
Isn't that odd?
In fact, the only people who ARE talking about this are considered "renegades", and responses to them range from snarky dismissal to outright hostility and calls for censorship. Tech platforms like Youtube are already censoring them and deleting their content, which Youtube openly admits to.
Wait - we can't talk about how nutrition works, in relation to the immune system?
Isn't this a strange thing to omit, "in a pandemic"?
It almost seems like their strategies are... inconsistent with a viral pandemic.
If you're facing a virus, then the logical response is to strengthen people's health, so that they have strong immune systems.
We know that nutrition is the foundation of health. Especially for the immune system. And we also know that a large portion of the population has no access to good nutrition. They're either too poor and can't afford it, or they live in a literal food desert where nutrition doesn't even exist in the first place.