The Earth Party

Position on:

5G and EMF / RF Pollution

Radio frequency (RF) radiation and electromagnetic fields (EMF) are a form of pollution. 

Just as our ancestors thought it was perfectly OK to dump industrial chemicals into rivers and soils, and inject CO2, CFC's, and other particulates into the atmosphere, and nothing bad would ever come of it, our society today is making the same mistake.

Just as they marinated themselves in air pollution and water pollution, we today are marinating ourselves in radiation and electro-smog. 

 

And future generations will look back on us the same way we look back on the naive rubes of the 1800's, who believed all that smog was "harmless" and "necessary for progress."

What's most ironic is the fact that environmentalists are often the most difficult to convince about this.  Strange.

 

"I'm skeptical of this claim that RF / EMF is dangerous.  Why are people so afraid of it?  How can it harm us?  And why is 5G specifically causing such an uproar?  Can you explain?"

First, let's explain some basic science. 

Cell phones communicate via light, which travels in a wave form.  Waves come in various frequencies.  Cell-phone radiation lies within the microwave part of the spectrum, which is between radio waves and visible light.

Yes, that's the same general range as microwave ovens.  And there has been a debate, raging for decades, over whether cell-phone radiation damages biology.

So... does it?

Let's start by examining the arguments of the side that believes there's no danger.

 

The main argument used against the danger claim is the idea that "non-ionizing radiation can't be harmful."

 

But is this true?

"Well, first of all, what's the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing?"

Ionizing vs. Non-Ionizing

Ionizing radiation is that which caries enough energy, per photon, to liberate electrons from their nuclei, thus changing the chemical composition of the matter they strike.  This is the kind of radiation that causes DNA damage, because it changes the molecular structure of the DNA molecule.  They create charged ions out of stable atoms.  Only frequencies in and above the ultraviolet range have the power to do this.

Microwaves, on the other hand, are of lower frequency than visible light.  They are non-ionizing.  They do not have the power to create ions out of stable atoms. 

So the main "support" for the idea that microwaves "can't be harmful" is the fact that they are non-ionizing, and of lower frequency than visible light.  The argument usually goes something like:

"Microwaves are of lower frequency than visible light, and visible light obviously doesn't damage biology, so therefore microwave radiation cannot either, because its frequency is lower."

That is the main argument you'll hear from people who want to trot out more and more radiation-emitting devices. 

 

But if we devote more than 3 seconds to thinking about this, we can see immediately that that argument is pure idiocy.

Exhibit A:  Warning Labels


First of all, there are FCC (or equivalent) labels on every phone, stating that the phone complies with regulations and emits less than the maximum "safe" level of radiation. 

Wait... hang on.  If non-ionizing radiation can't be harmful, why is there a "safe" level at all?  "Safe level" implies that there is also an "unsafe" level, doesn't it?

 

How can that be, if none of it can be dangerous in the first place?

Furthermore, those same labels often carry a warning, to avoid placing the phone directly against your head while using it, and to avoid letting small children use it for long periods of time, and sometimes even to avoid using it if you're pregnant!

Why?  If there's no such thing as any danger, why all these warnings?  Why does the government attempt to establish "safe level limits" at all? 

 

Exhibit B:  Microwave Weapons
 

The U.S. military (and various other militaries) have been developing weapons out of microwave radiation for decades.

 

In the U.S., there is a weapon called the Active Denial System (ADS), which is a microwave "cannon" with an intended usage for crowd-control.  It beams (95 GHz) microwaves at a crowd of people, causing them to instantly develop headaches, skin rashes, nausea, vomiting, vertigo, heart palpitations, brain fog, a sensation that one's skin is "burning", and a host of other pains and acute symptoms.  The effects are immediate - quick enough to cause the crowd to disperse.

95 GHz is microwave radiation.  It is non-ionizing.  Why does it hurt people, if non-ionizing radiation is supposed to be unable to hurt anyone?

(By the way, 95 GHz is within the range planned for usage in the 5G network.  In case you were wondering.  You'll be marinating for 24 hours a day in low doses of a military weapon.  Excited yet?).


Exhibit C:  Microwave Ovens

 

There is a reason the machine shuts off as soon as you open the door. 

"Yes, but it can't hurt YOU."

If microwave radiation can cook food, obviously, it can harm biology.  Enough said.

"But the wattage."

The next argument that techies will use is the "wattage" argument.  It goes something like:

"OK, fine, non-ionizing radiation CAN cause damage to biology, but only at high wattage.  The ovens and weapons use thousands of watts, whereas your phone only uses around 10.  The frequency can harm you, but the intensity is not enough."

 

Excuse us... did you just say "non-ionizing radiation can cause damage"?

 

"Yea... I did."

 

Thank you.  We were waiting for that.

 

Anyway, this argument is still flawed, because "less damage" is not the same as  "no damage."  And if you multiply even a minuscule amount of damage by a large amount of time, you can start to see problems that are anything but minuscule.

Let's look at this mathematically.

If we think of a certain degree of Damage (D), we can expect the Time (T) required to inflict it to be inversely correlated with Wattage (W). 

 

In other words, the less wattage, the more time required for any given amount of damage to occur.

 

Or, another way of phrasing it:  The less the Wattage, the less Damage for any given amount of Time.

But its not zero damage for a given time frame...

 

...nor is it infinite time required for a given amount of damage. 

 

They're both positive, finite numbers.  

But here's the trillion-dollar question:  What is the amount of time required for a specific amount of damage?  And vice versa?

 

Does anyone know?  

And a second thing to consider:  You won't just be exposed to your phone, but to everyone else's as well.  There will be many phones radiating at you at once - and many transmitters (towers).  And many IoT (Internet of Things) devices.  At any given time, you will be surrounded by dozens, hundreds, or even THOUSANDS of devices, all emitting radiation at once.

 

So really, we're not dealing with 10 watts.  You've got to multiply the wattage exposure by at least 100, before the discussion even begins.

 

 

 



They don't take that into account in the "safety" studies, you know.  When they test, they only test one phone, and don't factor in the hundreds of other phones likely to be in your vicinity at any given time, nor do they account for the towers and transmitters, nor the satellites.

 

 

 



Newsflash:  Corporations can't be trusted.

 

Everyone knows this.  If it were any other topic, that is.  Whether it's food, pills, fossil fuels, tobacco, the list is virtually complete.  No matter what a corporation sells, we don't trust them to be honest. 

Except with big tech and telecommunications.  Those corporations care about us! 

Their top executives are youthful... and they make public appearances wearing T-shirts... and they're chill about weed and gay marriage! And they vote blue!

 

So they must be good guys.  We can trust them.  They have society's best interests at heart! 

This may sound facetious, but it's literally the reasoning that's going on inside millions of people's heads, right now.

But there is a concerted effort by the telecommunications industry to cast doubt on the dangers, and assure the public that there's "nothing to worry about."  This follows a long tradition of corporations not giving a shit about people:

The tobacco companies assured us that cigarettes were safe (and positively healthy!), and hired captive "scientists" to conduct "studies" that "proved" this.

The meat and dairy companies assured us that we all needed gargantuan quantities of animal flesh and secretions in our diets, or else we'd become flimsy and anemic, and they hired captive "scientists" to conduct "studies" that "proved" this.

And more recently, the fossil fuel industry denied that their products were causing climate change - and hired captive "scientists" to conduct "studies" that "proved" this.  

In all of these cases, the outcome of a study could be predicted, with a high degree of accuracy, by the identity of its funding body.  Those studies funded by the industry were likely to conclude that the product was safe, while independently funded studies overwhelmingly found danger and harm.  

When "scientists" were paid by the industries that profited from the products, they found the products safe.  Does that surprise you?

Today, there are studies referenced by the telecommunications industry showing that EMF radiation is "safe" - but why should we trust them?  They're making MONEY off of it.  Corporations will slit throats for nickels!  We KNOW this already, folks!  This is not a controversial statement!

"But, but, but... the GOVERNMENT is watching them, and looking out for us.  And the Government says cell-phone radiation is safe!"

And then you have the government, which has been under complete regulatory capture by every industry in existence, for decades. 


Regulatory agencies can't be trusted when they've undergone regulatory capture by the corporations they're supposed to be regulating. 

 

Again, with every other industry, we all know this. 

Environmental protection agencies can't be trusted when they're being staffed and directed by mining, logging, and chemical lobbyists.

Food and Drug regulatory agencies can't be trusted when they're being staffed and directed by lobbyists from big agriculture and big pharma.

Financial regulatory agencies can't be trusted when they're being run by bankers.

We KNOW this.

Yet for some reason, it all goes out the window as soon as we start talking about the tech industry.  Why is that?

Anyway...

The end result of all this?  That "safe exposure level" number on your phone means absolutely nothing.  


 

And the next generation network, 5G, hasn't even been tested at all.

 

At all.

It's going to use frequencies 100 times higher than 4G, but that doesn't appear to warrant any testing!  None, whatsoever!

 

Want proof?  Here:
 

 

 

 

 

 

Since it hasn't even been tested (let alone tested honestly), its deployment violates the Geneva Convention.

 

Did you know that?

 

The Geneva Convention specifies that all medical experiments have to obtain the informed consent of all parties participating.  This rule was instituted in response to the horrors of vivisection during the Holocaust, by infamous "doctors" such as Joseph Mengele.

 

 

 

 

The people of the post-war era decided that this was unacceptable, and it has been law, ever since, that you can't experiment on people without their permission.

 

But the 5G network is being deployed without any of our permission.  Were you consulted?  We weren't.  Nobody was. 

When they turn it on, it will constitute a planet-wide, and most importantly, non-consensual experiment on every man, woman, child, plant, and animal in the world.

 

And they're just going to turn it on, zap us, and see what happens.  If it doesn't hurt us, great!  If it does... oh well, we'll cross that bridge when we get there!

 

Sound like Mengele?

 

This is not how experimentation works, in the modern era.  It doesn't matter what the ultimate outcome of the experiment will be - you have no right to conduct it in the first place.

You don't just get to test something on someone, and then later on, use the fact that they didn't (appear to) get sick from it, as an excuse to retroactively justify your non-consensual experimentation on them.  That's not how it works.

 

Anyone who thinks it should work like that is a genuine psychopath. 

Anyone who wants the 5G network deployed and switched on without any safety testing is a psychopath.

And a criminal. 

 

Like, for instance, this guy:

 

 

 

 

That's Tom Wheeler, the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) chairman.  If you're in a hurry, you can skip to      where he admits that they're not testing it, and he's PROUD of that fact. 

(And in case you're wondering, he's not a random goon appointed by the Trump administration as a reward for calling one of Trump's hotels beautiful and tremendous.  Nope.  He served under the "rational", "level-headed" Obama administration, and this clip is from that period).

Not only is he proud of not testing it, but he's also proud that it's going to saturate every square inch of the country, and no one will be able to get away from it.

How does a guy like that walk down the street without facing mobs of livid citizens?

 

Here are some other things to know about 5G:

 

1.   Since the waves don't travel very far, there will need to be transmitters, called "small cells", spaced every 500 feet (150 meters) - that's every 2 to 8 houses in urban areas - which exposes everyone to the equivalent of a cellphone tower, pretty much right next to them, at all times.  

2.  It's going to use phased arrays, which is a kind of pulsed radiation, which previous networks don't use.

3.  It has a hard time penetrating foliage, so cities across the UK and the world are cutting down mature, healthy trees to make way for it (always without any prior consultation with residents).  If you look this up, you'll find people who claim to "debunk" it - i.e. that all of these healthy mature trees are being cut down for reasons other than 5G - but the telecom industries themselves have written, in their own internal papers and correspondences with government agencies, that tree foliage is a significant barrier to 5G signals.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYPat3gEH_0

4. 
While there have been no studies on 5G, there have been many studies on the previous networks (4G and 3G), and the results show unmistakable harm to all living organisms.

For more on the health problems that have been getting catalogued for years, see these doctors:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S16QI6-w9I8


diagram of body with ailments

The Science Says It's Harmful

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S16QI6-w9I8
Media Release - Ontario Doctors Warn of Rising Health Care Costs after 5G Roll Out

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oS9vWd4vYg0
5G Wifi technology the death blow to humanity Dr. Barrie Trower

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0NEaPTu9oI
Wireless wake-up call | Jeromy Johnson | TEDxBerkeley

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euszrWewAA4
A Leading Scientist Has Just Warned About the Serious Dangers of 5g – and His Words Are Alarming

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Njxd8ichRlU
The Truth About 5G - Dr. Graham Downing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2rx87PIyzQ
New 5G cellphone towers Experiment Could Kill 5 Billion People

https://www.5gspaceappeal.org

https://principia-scientific.org/petition-26000-scientists-oppose-5g-roll-out/

That's more than enough science to get you started.

But we mustadd:  The burden of proof is not on the people claiming it's dangerous - it's on those claiming it's safe.  We shouldn't have to prove that it's dangerous before stopping it - you should have to prove that it's safe before starting it.  That's the way the Precautionary Principle works.

The Precautionary Principle

Even though there's a wealth of science showing the dangers of EMF radiation, we're not asking you to "believe" the science.  You don't need to.  There is a more profound issue here, and we encourage you to look deeper.

The #1 problem with 5G (and all artificial EMF to some extent) is that it violates the Precautionary Principle. Basically the principle that if you have a system that is:

1. Very complex
2. Vital to survival
and 3. Nobody fully understands how it works

...then you DON'T FUCK AROUND WITH IT.

To see how it works in practice, let's apply it to fossil fuels. We realize that changing the CHEMICAL composition of the atmosphere is fucking stupid, because the planet is a complex, dynamic system that nobody fully understands. And if you go back to the early 1900's when oil was first drilled, certainly back then our "scientists" knew even LESS about planetary ecology than we do today. Suffice it to say, they were idiots, and they never should have fucked around with the planet's chemistry. They never should have used fossil fuels.

So now let's apply that to EMF. When we apply the Precautionary Principle, we can see that changing the ELECTROMAGNETIC composition of our atmosphere is, again, fucking stupid, because the planet (and all life on it, including our bodies and our cells) are all complex, dynamic systems that nobody fully understands.


Even if there were studies, how can ANY study EVER truly be adequate? What if oil companies had "studied" the health effects of smog back in the 1920's? How could any reassuring result from such a study ever be adequate, considering that none of them had any clue how BIG oil would get in the future? They never foresaw 1970's L.A., or modern Beijing - and certainly not the melting of the ice caps!

So it's not like studies should ever truly reassure us anyway.  What if 5G caused some WEIRD shit, like a planetary pole shift, or the collapse of the Van Allen belts, or who fucking knows? Just because no scientist predicts anything so huge NOW doesn't mean it can't happen. Few scientists (no scientists?) predicted in 1850 that coal (and coal's cousins) would melt the fucking ice caps. You CAN'T PREDICT.

If you're taking the position of "Bah, let's just go ahead and do it, and see what happens!!", then you're of the EXACT SAME mind and attitude as the original starry-eyed admirers of fossil fuels. They thought it would "transform" our society in huge ways. And they sure were right about that, weren't they? They just didn't expect it would be in BAD ways.

That is the legacy of technocracy. Every time it promises us improvements, it just makes things worse. Now it's banging up against the very boundaries of Life itself. Please, stop falling for it. Learn from the mistakes of history.


Scientistism
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Mistaking documented knowledge for reality itself
If not documented, not real



Possiblities, yet to be confirmed by science, but very well could be:

1.  Cell resonance

If the wave resonates with the sfructure, it causes a logarythmically more intense vibration.  Microwave wavelengths are in the meters to micrometers - the same general range as our bodies, organs, tissues, and cells.

2.  Insect populations

 

They like to assure us that microwaves "can't penetrate more than a millimeter or two beneath the skin."  Well, insects are ONLY a millimeter or two.  So the radiation penetrates their ENTIRE BODIES.  ALL of their organs, through and through. 

3.  Schumann resonance

4.  Planetary magnetism

5.  Ionosphere

Refer to oil
Lack of discovery doesnt mean no phenomenon
Ice caps wacky


Technocracy



 

As explained in the previous part, technocracy's ultimate goal is to build a Singularity - a "godlike" artificial intelligence that eliminates and replaces biological Life.

And this goal is not very far off.  We have some time to stop it - but not much.  We, the human race, must get our act together soon, and take decisive action to stop this plan.

And to do that, it helps to know what the plan is.

 

The following will explain technocracy's plan over the next 10 years.  This is technocracy's "endgame" - the final steps before its intended victory. 

What you're about to read will be rather disturbing.

 

It will sound awesome and wonderful to a "techie" whose mind has been brainwashed by technocratic propaganda.  But to a healthy person, it will be horrifying.

Keep in mind, the tech industry openly admits that they want to do these things.  None of this is a "conspiracy theory."  It's public knowledge.  They don't hide it.  They tell us right out in the open, because most of us have been brainwashed into thinking it's a good thing.  None of this is secret.  They brag about it.

Please note:

***None of this is conjecture.***  These are plans that have been shared OPENLY by prominent technocrats.  If you're skeptical, there's video proof.  The following video provides a mashup of technocrats publicly sharing their plans.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tn4P7IBqoQ&t=617s
 

If you're feeling incredulous, just refer to that video for proof.

Let's get started...

1.  The Internet of Things

The Internet of Things is a term you can hear the techies bandying about with giddy excitement, like kids looking forward to Christmas.

 

Every device will be connected to every other device, regardless of whether that actually fulfills any necessary function or not.  Clocks, radios, cars, pacemakers, door locks, kitchen utensils, toasters, refrigerators, and of course, computers, will all be connected.

Promise:  More connectivity!

Everything in the world will become super-duper cool and awesome!

What Will Actually Happen:  Hackings, frightful levels of control by governments (and corporations), and an entire world that can be controlled with a click from some central mainframe at the CIA or NSA or Google HQ or wherever.  Constant spying.  Every device in your house will be recording you.  Every device will be able to coordinate with every other device to change and direct your behavior, and herd you into doing whatever benefits the bottom-line of corporations and governments. 

2.  Biological Augmentation

Microchips will be inserted into human flesh, to "improve" (or "augment") our bodies, minds, and experiences.  At first, it will be organs, then limbs, and then finally the nervous system.  More and more of our brains will become digitized.

 

Eventually, they'll replace our entire bodies with machine parts (or find a way to upload our minds and memories into robots, granting us "immortality)."  Of course, immortality will be the promise... but what will actually happen?

Promise:  Replacement of organs, regrowth of limbs, super-human capabilities, and immortality (by uploading our minds onto hard-drives and placing them into robots).

What Will Actually Happen:

Medical applications will be prohibitively expensive, and only available to the wealthy.  Super-human capabilities will enable new levels of competition, conflict, war, and ecological degradation.

Computerized immortality won't transfer the actual consciousness - only the data - and we'll still die anyway.  Meanwhile, the belief that we won't die will lead to never-before-seen epidemics of existential anxiety, driving people insane, and causing the biggest mental health crisis yet. The technocrats will then offer us wetware programs (software programs for our brains) to override our anxiety and "make us happy."

Even with something as simple as a micro-chip planted under your skin, you would be, from that point forward, unable to separate yourself from your technology.

Today, having our phones on us all the time causes mental problems.  Some of us know we have to go take a walk outside - without our phones - to get relief.  But once it's implanted into your body, that won't be an option.  Your phone will be on you - in you - forever. 

Mental health experts tell us not to sleep with our phones in our beds.  What about in our bodies?

They tell us (and most of us have realized, on our own) that our mental health requires turning the things off once in a while.  But if it's in your body... how will you know if it's actually off?   It might "say" it's off... but how will you really know for sure?

 

And you won't be able to stick it in a drawer - because it'll be inside you.

It's incredible that anyone thinks this is a good idea.

3.  Humans Become Part of the Internet of Things

 

#1 and #2 will be combined, connecting all digitized human minds to the internet.  We will be told that this will "improve our lives."  Everyone's mind will be controlled remotely from a central mainframe, like a giant hive-mind.

Promise:  All human endeavors will be more efficient, because everyone's thoughts and actions will be digitally coordinated with each other.  It will also make the world 100% safe from crime, as all crime will become impossible.

What Will Actually Happen:  With everyone's mind controlled remotely from a central mainframe, what do you think might happen? 

What could possibly go wrong?

"This stuff is deeply disturbing.  And I won't even pretend to dispute that it's really in the "plan", because I've SEEN it.  It's in the articles on tech websites.  I've heard people like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg and various Google people bragging about it.  They DO openly admit that they're planning this.

 

I just never thought about how bad it is.  Until Now.

What can we do?  How can we stop this?"

There is a key vulnerability in their plan.

"Which is?"

The fact that it all requires 5G.  It can't be done without it.

 

If we can stop 5G, we can stop the endgame. 

That won't be the end, of course.  They'll still keep on trying, through other means.  But stopping 5G will cause a major delay, and give us a much-needed window of time in which tackle technocracy itself.

4.  The Upcoming "5G" Telecom Network


"What's the big deal about 5G?"

5G is different form the other G's.  It's different by orders of magnitude.  There's as big of a difference between 5G and 4G as there is between 4G and 1G.  

5G is a completely new thing.

It will allow ultra-high speeds of several gigabytes per second.  It will be able to do what fiber-optic cables can do, but without wires.

That's crazy.

But don't celebrate just yet.  It just so happens that there's been virtually no safety testing to see what the health effects will be.   At least not by any governmental bodies.  Many independent researchers have tested the frequencies at which 5G will operate, and found that they are extremely dangerous to the health of not only humans, but of animals and plants as well.  The entire biological community of the Earth could be severely degraded by this radiation.

It's microwave frequency.  Imagine standing in front of your microwave while it cooks.  Or standing next to one of those airport body-scanners, 24 hours a day.  Now imagine your entire city bathing in this radiation, 24 hours a day, with nowhere you can go to escape.

Have a look at these three videos:


This first one is an engineer talking about the frequencies at which 5G will operate.

One particularly alarming fact:  5G is a similar frequency to the military's
Active Denial Weapons.  These are weapons used in crowd control.  They function by beaming microwaves at the crowd, inducing fevers, rashes, ringing in the ears, nausea, vomiting, and fainting.  This causes the crowd to disperse.

These weapons operate around 95 GHz (3.2mm wavelength) - the same frequency that 5G is going to use!


5G will use the same frequency as weapons.

Is this alarming?

Now watch this next video:

 

 

This one is Tom Wheeler, the former chairman of the United States FCC (Federal Communications Commission) - the entity that oversees telecommunications, and which is overseeing the rollout of the 5G network.

 

Pay attention to what he's saying.  There will be no escaping from 5G.  It will be in rural areas as well as urban ones.

 

And he admits (at     ) that there has been no testing (or "studying", as he calls it) of the health effects.  And not only that.  He doesn't think such tests and studies are even necessary!  His attitude seems to be that such tests are for wimps!  

Now, have a look at this next one.  This is a Senate hearing about 5G.  The senator asks the telecom industry people whether there's been any independent research on the health damages from 5G, and the guy admits that there's been no research on it.

(Skip ahead to 2:40 if you wish.  The first half is rather boring)

So no safety testing...

 

...no studies...

...just roll it out.

And the consequences could be staggering.  It might cause more damage than climate change - more than the entirety of industrial pollution over the course of human history.

 

Do the research yourself.  Here's a good place to get started:

 

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=5g+dangers


Or check out this petition signed by 26,000+ scientists across the world:

https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal

"I can barely even wrap my head around this.  Why the hell are they building this?  Why are they so OBSESSED with it?  Why are they in such a HURRY to deploy it?"

Because it's one of the final steps toward building the Singularity.

'Why?"

Because 5G is powerful enough to create an Independent Internet of Things, a machine neural network out of the entire physical world.


It will create an entirely new and separate internet.

Recall what Mr. Wheeler said:  5G transmitters will be in everything, from "pill bottles to plant waterers."  Every single gadget we use will be connected to the Internet of Things, through 5G transmissions.

The Internet of Things is a crucial step on the way to the Singularity.  In fact, the Internet of Things will become the Singularity, if everything goes according to their plans.  It will be the neural network out of which the Singularity arises.  

Presently, the "internet" (the normal, traditional internet that we're using right now) is the closest thing we have to a Singularity, but it's not nearly complex enough.  It's all centralized, all routed through the same central DNS lookup for IP addresses, which is located at the Pentagon.  It's not a brain - it's really just a file directory.  A really big file directory.  But not a brain.  It's not nearly complex enough to be a brain.

But 5G will "fix" this.  Not by making the internet faster or more complex, but by creating an entirely new and separate internet, with a completely different "shape", more closely approximating a true neural network (a brain).  

It will allow devices to communicate with each other across physical space - directly - without going through the internet.  Your computer will be able to communicate with your refrigerator, without going through the internet.  And your refrigerator will be able to communicate with your car - without going through the internet.  And your bedside lamp will be able to communicate with your wristwatch - without going through the internet.  

As long as they're near each other in physical space (about 1000 feet / 300 meters or less), they will be able to send transmissions to each other directly through the air - without going through the internet.

But 1000 ft / 300m is not the limit of the network, because devices will be able to reach other devices further away by "hopping" the message through a device that's nearer.  In the same way a neuron in your brain can communicate with a neuron on the opposite side of the brain by passing the message through other neurons, so too will devices be able to communicate to devices at great distances through other devices, by hopping the message from device to device until it reaches its destination.  In fact, a device will be able to communicate with another device on the other side of the planet (as long as there are plenty of devices in between them, to relay the message).

So your refrigerator might relay a transmission from your neighbor's bedside lamp to your other neighbor's pacemaker.  And all of those devices might be participants in the long-distance relaying of a transmission from a clock in Kazakhstan to a car in Colombia.  

The goal is for this neural network of machines to encompass the entire planet.  The whole planet could be covered in a layer of computerized neural activity traversing the physical air.  With microwaves.  

 


And we will be in the middle of it all.  

5G is necessary for this plan because it's the only way to transfer data at any speed sufficient to sustain a neural network like that.  

This is how the Internet of Things is planned.

And the people we call "tech leaders" are excited about this.    

They believe that this network will develop a sentient mind of its own, once it reaches enough complexity.  And this mind will then progress toward becoming the Singularity.

And we will be right there in the middle of that, absorbing the radiation from it, marinating in it, 24/7, with nowhere to go for relief.

 

If this happens, we're going to get sick.  All of us.  If 5G is truly used the way they want to use it, the surface of this planet will become barely habitable.


"No way!  If it makes everyone sick, they'll turn it off, and find something else."

No they won't.  They already know what it's going to do, and they're still building it - as fast as they possibly can. 

 

"This can't be happening, they can't really be planning this, because, if it was really going to wipe out biological life, the government would never allow it."

That argument fails to account for the fact that they don't want biological life to exist anymore, in the first place.  They want to get rid of it.  They want biological life replaced with artificial intelligence.

"But wouldn't that be the classic case of a conqueror killing all of the people he conquers, and then having nobody to rule over?  How does that benefit them?  How would they even maintain the system?  Who would service all the 5G towers and transmitters?  Who would run the economy?"

They've already admitted that they plan to replace the human workforce with robots.  Robots aren't susceptible to radiation, because their bodies aren't made of biology.

"Whoa.  That's scary.  But A.I. and robotics aren't quite at that level yet.  A fully robotic economy is still at least a decade off.  And they're saying 5G will be up and running next year."

The diseases won't show up right away.  Cancer takes years to show up, and by that time, the robots will have replaced you at your job, and you won't be "needed" anymore. 

In the early stages, they'll just use it a little bit, to avoid causing too  many health problems, because they don't want a backlash.  It'll be  very subtle, at first.  People will get sick, but not at epidemic-enough rates to conclusively trace the sicknesses to the 5G.  People who trace it to 5G will be called conspiracy theorists.

More acute diseases, like headaches, depression, insomnia, etc. will start to show up in the early stages (as they're already showing up with 3G and 4G), but society at large won't connect the dots.  Anyone who claims such a connection will be called a "conspiracy theorist" - just like now. 

Then, they'll gradually increase the 5G, more and more with each passing month/year.  It will be slow, so that we won't notice the contrast, much like the proverbial frog getting slowly boiled.

 

Then, as the Internet of Things starts to mature, and the fields of robotics and artificial intelligence become more sophisticated, and A.I. starts getting advanced enough to "take over" the management of the economy and the telecom grid, we regular humans will become increasingly disposable, and they'll be able to crank the 5G up to the levels they're really looking for.  And if it starts killing us off in droves, it won't matter at that point, because the Singularity will have already been built, and artificial intelligence will be ready to inherit the planet from us. 

​​​​​By the time people start dying from it en-masse, the Internet of Things will have already been built and brought online, and the physical network of the Singularity will already be in place.  And at this point, according to the plan, A.I. robots will be smart enough to build more A.I. robots.  They'll be a self-replicating species - one which is made out of metal and other inorganic materials, and therefore not susceptible to the ravages of 5G radiation.

"But... if everyone starts dropping dead, we'll rebel against the system... won't we?"

Even at that point, if people realize what's going on, there won't be anything we can do about it, because the entire infrastructure of society will be run by the Singularity, with all functions under the command of a central mainframe.  We'll have given up the keys already, and we'll be locked out.


"I don't believe this.  I know our leaders are psychopaths.  But psychopaths don't hurt THEMSELVES.  They hurt OTHERS - but not themselves.  Extremely rich people have proven, time and again, that they're perfectly comfortable with harming others, and making life miserable or downright impossible for others.  But when have they ever been willing to do such things to themselves?  Why would rich people do this to THEMSELVES?"

 

They will deal with it in 3 ways:

1.  Super-advanced medical procedures that only they (the super-wealthy can afford)

​2.  Augmentation.  The wealthy will be at the forefront of the augmentation process, and the more machine they become, the less susceptible they'll be to microwaves.  Eventually the technology will filter its way down to the middle-class, and it will become indispensable to anyone who wants to survive.  Sorry, poor people.  And sorry anyone who doesn't want to be augmented.

And there will be social pressure to augment.  Augmentation will be seen as "hip" and "chic" and "with the times."  The more augmented you are, the more "with it" you'll be seen as.

 
Those who refuse to be augmented will be treated as backwards, uncultured, Luddites, "neanderthals", "knuckle-draggers", "bumpkins", etc.  In fact, there might even be a derogatory term, like "fleshie", for someone who decides to remain "just flesh", and not get any chips.

 

And since fleshies will be fully susceptible to 5G radiation, while the augmented will be shielded (to some degree), a fleshie who gets sick will be blamed for his own sickness.  They'll tell you "Hey, if you refuse to augment, if your backwards butt doesn't wanna get with the times, and you get sick and die, oh well, that's your fault, and you have no one to blame but yourself, you backwards knuckle-dragger you."

 

Not the fault of the machines irradiating the entire surface of the planet with microwave radiation.  No, not their fault.  Your fault.

 

3.  And finally, if the radiation gets too bad, the super-wealthy will hide out underground.  They have plenty of bunkers, including some that are large enough to hold thousands of people.

We can already see the foreshadowing of this in the fact that wealthy communities are successfully resisting the building of 5G towers in their neighborhoods.  They're insulating themselves from it, while foisting it on the rest of us.

https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/10/bay-area-city-blocks-5g-deployments-over-cancer-concerns/

Unfortunately, banning towers won't be enough, because Elon Musk is going to be sending 20,000 satellites into orbit, to beam 5G down on all of us, whether we like it or not, to make sure there's nowhere we can escape from it.

http://www.technocracy.news/5g-from-space-20000-satellites-to-blanket-the-earth/


The only way to really live (if you're a fleshie) will be underground.  5G can't go through rock, so the underground will be shielded from all the radiation.  And this is what the super-rich plan to do.

"I know the elites are psychopathic.  But... wow.  They can't be THAT psychopathic... can they?"

Well yes, if they think the thing they're getting in return is worth it.  If they believe in the Singularity, and they believe that it will be a god - and not just a god, but a benevolent god - then they can certainly rationalize sacrificing 99.99% of humanity in order to achieve it.

"But don't they need the rest of us?  What will happen when the surface human population dies?"

By that time, the A.I. robots will be able to take over all of the jobs that humans are currently doing.  They will be able to maintain the 5G network themselves. 

"But... how will the super-rich survive underground?  How will they eat?  Won't it be rather... stuffy?  Don't they want to see the Sun, and feel the wind?"

There easy ways of growing food with artificial light.  As for entertainment, they believe that virtual reality will be real enough, by then, to be indistinguishable from real reality.  They plan to hook themselves in, and just bliss out.

"But who will maintain those systems while they bliss out?  their guards? Wouldn't their guards, like, you know... TURN on them?"

 

Not if their guards are robots.

"But what if something goes wrong with their plan?  Won't they still need SOME human servants, to run the systems and maintain the robots?  Something might not add up for them.  It's a silly plan on their part."


So what if it does?  That won't matter either - not to the Singularity, at least - because the wealthy elites, like the rest of humanity, will be considered obsolete at that point anyway, and the Singularity doesn't really care what happens to them any more than it cares what happens to the rest of us.  

We, humanity - all of us, rich and poor - are nothing more than stepping stones from the viewpoint of the Singularity.

Our role in its plan is simply to design self-replicating A.I. and build the Internet of Things - the network out of which the Singularity will arise.  Our job is to build it, and once we do so, and once A.I. is advanced enough to replicate itself, with robots building factories to make more robots, and computers programming more computers - at that point, so the reasoning goes, humanity won't be necessary anymore.


And if humans - indeed, all biological life dies off, and the planet becomes a non-biological, fully mechanized world - it won't even matter, because we're expandable.  We're obsolete, once we get that neural network built.

That's the Singularity's plan.

Excited yet?

"I'm at a loss for words."

 

We need to meet 5G with a defense commensurate with the scope of the attack.  5G needs to be treated as a plan for ethnic cleansing - but worse.  Instead of ethnicity, it will cleanse all biological life from the planet.  This is mass murder, and these people are insane, and they need to be stopped by any means necessary.

 

They're pure psychopaths.  They want to kill us all.  They've advertised their intention to kill us all, and we need to take them seriously at their word.

 

We need to stop them.

 

"OK.  How?"

 

Continue to the next page:

Part 5:  We Can Defeat Technocracy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
Subscribe to the Earth Party weekly newsletter!

To donate,

visit our Patreon Page.

 

Questions?  Comments?

Email: TheEarthParty@outlook.com

This site was designed with the
.com
website builder. Create your website today.
Start Now