Why Can't "Science" Be Corrupt?

Updated: Jul 25

Many of us grew up believing that Academia is the one institution that is immune from corruption.


We gradually came to terms with the reality of corruption in every other major institution of society... but not Academia.


We learned that corporations are inherently corrupt and could not be trusted.


We eventually learned the same thing about politicians.


And banks.


And the media.


And churches.


And the entertainment industry.


And the oil industry


And the police.


And the judicial system.


And the acronym agencies, like the FBI and CIA and MI6.


And governments.


One by one, we gained awareness of the corruption in all of them.


But all the while, there's been one that we kept our trust in. One which we've singled out as eternally incorruptible.


And that is the institution of science and academia.


Pure and incorrupible, forever.

The corruption that infected all the rest of society's major institutions has "passed this one by", and the mere concept of Academia or "Science" becoming corrupted is an oxymoron, a paradox - a non-concept. Something so far outside of Reality that it cannot even be mentioned without perfunctory displays of virtue-signalling snark.


This one will always remain a bastion of rational thought. Forever. And nothing will ever change that. It's invincible.


And therefore, if someone is so accomplished as to sport credentials from the Academy (via one of its authorized sub-institutions, like a college, university, or other scientific organization), then he or she is an Authority Figure.


These are basic facts about the Universe and its nature. To even question one of these is to reveal oneself as a backwards, ignorant, knuckledragging Neanderthal. A troglodyte. To question the Authority of the Academy or its authorized Representatives is to be anti-science and anti-intellectual. A deplorable.


Deference to Academia has become a religion.




But we have no reason to believe in it. Such a belief would indeed be unscientific. Because there is massive corruption within Academia, and within all of its sub-institutions, and within the venerable scientific community.


Money has infiltrated all of them.


They do the bidding of their financiers. Just like politicians. This is not a hard concept to grasp.


We understand that politicians serve those who fund them, even if it goes against their own constituents' best interests. So why is it impossible for the same thing to be happening in Academia?


Why?


Why can't academics, like professors and scientists and doctors, also be influenced to serve the interests of their financiers?


They obviously can be.


And who are their financiers? They're almost invariably corporations. If they're not corporations, they're "Foundations" funded by corporations. And billionaires. Or they're governments like those of the United States, Canada, England, Australia, France, the UN, and so forth, which are also bought-and-paid-for by corporations. The corporation's fund the governments and the government's fund the academic and scientific institutions. So either way, it's still corporate money funding all of this. The institution of Academia is captive to the corporate world.


And perhaps nowhere is this more obvious than in the field of medicine.


Big Pharma corporations control Academics in medicine. And they have been using that control to steer medicine onto a technocratic path, which has nothing to do with actual health, and everything to do with consolidating more and more power in the hands of the Pharma corporations and their associated elites. Just like the military-industrial complex used our fear of terrorism to launch wars in other countries to take their natural resources, so, too, is the medical industrial complex is exploiting our fear of germs, to enact a new stage of totalitarian control over the population.


Yes, it's a conspiracy theory. But why should that matter, if it's being proven true, more and more with each passing day?


Everything we believe now - all of the basic tenets of reality the world now accepts as self-evidently obivous - were at one point considered conspiracy theories. At one point, it was a "conspiracy theory" that the high-and-noble-and-unquestionably-pure-and-good Vatican was covering up evidence of the Earth revolving around the Sun.


"No way the Roman Catholic Church would be lying to us about the shape of the Earth. The Pope is infallible! If you question Him, you're a conspiracy theorist! Go put on your sheep-skin hat!"


People who DISPUTED the flat-earth theory 1000 years go

But it didn't end there.


In the 1950s, probably up through the end of the twentieth century, the majority of people still thought that corporations were altruistic entities, run by good people, just because they want to do some good in the world - and if they make a little money from it? Well that's a nice perk, but it's not their main motivation for being in business. They just want to help people!


That's what most of us believed about corporations. But that myth collapsed. Almost nobody believes in that anymore.


And it took us a little longer to realize the same thing about governments. But we realized.


Eventually we did. We figured out that that governments were corrupt. We realized that if corporations control the government, and the corporations are corrupt, then it stands to reason that the government is corrupt as well.


Then we eventually realized that the civil service was corrupted as well. The Regulatory Agencies. We saw them getting captured by the very industries that they were supposed to be regulating.


If the mining industry can capture the mining Regulatory Agencies...

...and the meat packing industry can capture the meat-packing inspection agencies...

...and the oil companies can capture the air emissions regulators...

...if Big AG can capture the FDA...

...and so forth...


...then why is it such a stretch to imagine that the medical industry could capture medical agencies, like the CDC and the NIH and the WHO?


(Or that the telecom industry could capture the FCC... but that's a topic for another page).


They get their funding from the corporations - or from corrupt governments whose politicians are bought and paid for by corporations.


The medical industry controls Medical Regulatory Agencies and medical Academia - and they're not controlling it with your best interests.


We know that the oil companies don't have our best interests at heart.


We know that the weapons manufacturers who supply the wars don't have our best interest at heart.


We know that the logging and mining companies don't have our best interests. They're just doing it for the money.


They're all doing it for the money.


So why are medical corporations exempt from this rule? Why are vaccine manufacturers exempt from this rule?


Why is any of Academia exempt from this rule?


Why is "The Scientific Community" exempt from this rule?


Does anyone have an answer for this?


They all will do whatever it takes to make the most money, even if it hurts you.

Even if it hurts everyone. It doesn't matter how much it hurts society, as long as they can make money doing it. This is the same for all industries.. It's not an exception for Academia.



190 views1 comment
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
Subscribe to the Earth Party weekly newsletter!

To donate,

visit our Patreon Page.

 

Questions?  Comments?

Email: TheEarthParty@outlook.com

This site was designed with the
.com
website builder. Create your website today.
Start Now